View Single Post
Old 11-26-03, 10:58 AM   #21
Elite Bastard
Hanners's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 984

Originally posted by digitalwanderer
Malfunction? What point are you trying to make?
That FutureMark are evil I think - Some people can't differentiate between 3DMark and PCMark.

Originally posted by Malfunction
You can't say. "Flawed"? How do you know it is so perfect? How do you know it isn't plagued with bugs?
Personally, I didn't experience any crashes, so I can say that in my experience it isn't flawed. Of course, you can almost guarantee that it isn't perfect or 100% bug free, but then again what software is? Because a piece of software has problems with massively overclocked systems, that doesn't make it unreliable.

Originally posted by Malfunction
You are straight out contradicting yourself.
Not really - The score was consistent across benchmark runs, so it was safe to assume that the problem was something else on my system, which is what I was trying to point out in what you quoted. Other peoples scores in the test I mentioned have born this out to be true as they are much, much higher than what I managed.
Owner / Editor-in-Chief - Elite Bastards
Hanners is offline   Reply With Quote