View Single Post
Old 11-26-03, 10:58 AM   #21
Hanners
Elite Bastard
 
Hanners's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 984
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by digitalwanderer
Malfunction? What point are you trying to make?
That FutureMark are evil I think - Some people can't differentiate between 3DMark and PCMark.


Quote:
Originally posted by Malfunction
You can't say. "Flawed"? How do you know it is so perfect? How do you know it isn't plagued with bugs?
Personally, I didn't experience any crashes, so I can say that in my experience it isn't flawed. Of course, you can almost guarantee that it isn't perfect or 100% bug free, but then again what software is? Because a piece of software has problems with massively overclocked systems, that doesn't make it unreliable.


Quote:
Originally posted by Malfunction
You are straight out contradicting yourself.
Not really - The score was consistent across benchmark runs, so it was safe to assume that the problem was something else on my system, which is what I was trying to point out in what you quoted. Other peoples scores in the test I mentioned have born this out to be true as they are much, much higher than what I managed.
__________________
Owner / Editor-in-Chief - Elite Bastards
Hanners is offline   Reply With Quote