View Single Post
Old 12-21-03, 11:12 AM   #12
The_Keeper
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1
Default Ti 4200 better then FX 5900?

The benchmarks speak for themselves

I got a PNY GeForce FX 5900 128MB and it runs slower than my PNY GeForce4 Ti 4200 64MB

Operating System Microsoft Windows XP Professional
OS Service Pack Service Pack 1
Internet Explorer 6.0.2800.1106 (IE 6.0 SP1)

Motherboard:
CPU Type AMD Athlon XP, 2000 MHz (7.5 x 267) 2400+
Motherboard Name Asus A7V266-C (5 PCI, 1 AGP, 3 DIMM)
Motherboard Chipset VIA VT8366A Apollo KT266A
System Memory 768 MB (DDR SDRAM)
BIOS Type Award Medallion (10/15/02)
Communication Port Communications Port (COM1)
Communication Port Communications Port (COM2)
Communication Port ECP Printer Port (LPT1)

Display:
Video Adapter NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 (128 MB)
3D Accelerator nVIDIA GeForce FX 5900
Monitor Plug and Play Monitor [NoDB] (1321249529)

Multimedia:
Audio Adapter Creative SB Live! Value (CT4780) Sound Card


Benchmarks using Unreal Tournament 2003 Demo

UT2003 Build UT2003_Build_[2002-09-13_17.31]
Windows XP 5.1 (Build: 2600)
AuthenticAMD PentiumPro-class processor @ 2021 MHz with 767MB RAM
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 (5303)

ctf-citadel?game=engine.gameinfo exec=..BenchmarkStuffflybyexec.txt -benchmark -seconds=77 -nosound

43.826839 / 120.002022 / 310.040833 fps rand(6878)
Score = 120.257225

UT2003 Build UT2003_Build_[2002-09-13_17.31]
Windows XP 5.1 (Build: 2600)
AuthenticAMD PentiumPro-class processor @ 2021 MHz with 767MB RAM
NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200 (5303)

ctf-citadel?game=engine.gameinfo exec=..BenchmarkStuffflybyexec.txt -benchmark -seconds=77 -nosound

46.669445 / 121.173897 / 297.415009 fps rand(6878)
Score = 121.419373

------------------------------------------------

UT2003 Build UT2003_Build_[2002-09-13_17.31]
Windows XP 5.1 (Build: 2600)
AuthenticAMD PentiumPro-class processor @ 2021 MHz with 767MB RAM
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 (5303)

dm-antalus?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=t rue -benchmark -seconds=77 -exec=..\Benchmark\Stuff\botmatchexec.txt

17.247145 / 45.993103 / 83.146538 fps rand(28881)
Score = 46.016144


UT2003 Build UT2003_Build_[2002-09-13_17.31]
Windows XP 5.1 (Build: 2600)
AuthenticAMD PentiumPro-class processor @ 2021 MHz with 767MB RAM
NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200 (5303)

dm-antalus?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=t rue -benchmark -seconds=77 -exec=..\Benchmark\Stuff\botmatchexec.txt

8.129602 / 47.214043 / 85.405258 fps rand(28881)
Score = 47.239532

------------------------------------------------------

UT2003 Build UT2003_Build_[2002-09-13_17.31]
Windows XP 5.1 (Build: 2600)
AuthenticAMD PentiumPro-class processor @ 2021 MHz with 767MB RAM
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 (5303)

br-anubis?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=tr ue -benchmark -seconds=77 -exec=..\Benchmark\Stuff\botmatchexec.txt

23.182434 / 65.594231 / 132.006607 fps rand(11570)
Score = 65.598808



UT2003 Build UT2003_Build_[2002-09-13_17.31]
Windows XP 5.1 (Build: 2600)
AuthenticAMD PentiumPro-class processor @ 2021 MHz with 767MB RAM
NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200 (5303)

br-anubis?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=tr ue -benchmark -seconds=77 -exec=..\Benchmark\Stuff\botmatchexec.txt

22.116615 / 67.264130 / 141.634109 fps rand(11570)
Score = 67.270065


From what I can see the Ti4200 outperformed the FX 5900 in all 3 tests?
Guess I'll stick with my 4200 and pack away the 5900 until DX9 becomes mainstream.
The_Keeper is offline   Reply With Quote