Originally Posted by ninelven
I called you a kid because I guessed you were one based off your behavior. You can take that however you want....
As long as you keep in mind that you should have actual supporting evidence before making a statement and representing it as fact
Really, then how's this:
The theoretical maximum that the GF110 is capable of is 37.06 Gigapixels/sec, but only delivers 9.6 gigapixels acording to that chart in practical terms.
The theoretical maximum of AMD's tahiti is just over 29 Gigapixels/sec, yet delivers those 13.3 Gigapixels/sec when mesured in practical terms...So it has less in theoretical maximum over the GF110 by a fair amount no less but delivers more in practical terms, wich is where it counts.
So who's more efficient and does this count as supporting evidence enough?....