View Single Post
Old 09-12-13, 12:32 PM   #60
slaWter
 
slaWter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 823
Default Re: Post Your Rig 2013 Edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by newparad1gm View Post
I think there was a case that at Surround resolutions, there was a sizable difference between 8x8 PCI-E lanes vs 16x16 for dual GPU systems, but that might have been at the 2.0 spec.
That could be some cases. However:
During my Tri-SLI testing the cards usually ran at x8 PCIe 2.x spec. Even extremely demanding tests showed no difference between x16/x8/x8 or x8/x8/x8 or x16/x16 (when using only two cards). There might be a few frames on the line but nothing major.

x8/x8 PCIe 3.0 like on Haswell for example is easily enough for a two card solution.


AFAIK, only Sandy Bridge E was "blocked" by nVidia for PCIe 3.0 because that CPU went through testing/certification before the PCIe specification was finalized.
__________________
Gaming PC Intel Core i7 4770K # ASUS Z87 DLX/Dual # 16GB DDR3 1600MHz # GTX TITAN # 2x Samsung 840 EVO 250GB RAID 0 # Silverstone TJ10 # obutto r3volution # 3x HP ZR30w 30" 7680x1600
MacBook Pro Retina 15" Mid 2012 # Intel Core i7 2.7GHz # 16GB DDR3 1600MHz # nVidia 650M 1024MB # Samsung 830 768GB SATA 3.0 & 512GB USB 3.0 # 27" LED Cinema Display
Fileserver Intel Core i3 530 1.2GHz # 4GB DDR3 1333MHz # Intel X25-V G2 40GB, WDC Scorpio 250GB # 16TB RAID 6 + 24TB RAID 6 # Adaptec RAID 5405 w/ Chenbro CK12804 SAS Expander # Norco RPC 4220
slaWter is offline   Reply With Quote