View Single Post
Old 02-20-04, 01:17 PM   #29
Registered User
|JuiceZ|'s Avatar
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Louisville
Posts: 3,286
Send a message via Skype™ to |JuiceZ|

Originally posted by OWA
While I agree that PCs are faster, if you read the sidebar by their sister Mac publication, their point was that Maximum PC was using PCs that weren't yet readily available to compare against Macs that had been out a while. So, they felt pretty good about the competition even though they lost the majority of the tests.
Thats true. I also argued the fact that they didn't use a "build" of WinXP 64bit when comparing the benefits of a 64bit processing in the AMD proc vs 64bit PowerMAC G5.

I have an appreciate for both sides, the each have their benefits.
primary MBP Core i5 2010 | HR | OCZ 120GB SSD
gaming Core i5-2500K @ 4.1GHz w/ CM Hyper212+ | MSI N560GTX-Ti TF II/OC | MSI P67A-GD55 | Silverstone FT02 | X360 250GB + Kinect
htpc IONITX-A-U | 2GB | M350 | XBMC Linux | SABnzbd, sickbeard, couchpotato | NAS Synology DS411J | 4TB
hometheater KURO PDP-5020 | Marantz SR6005 | Definitive BP7001s, CLR3000, BPVXPs
|JuiceZ| is offline   Reply With Quote