View Single Post
Old 03-29-04, 02:12 PM   #47
Registered User
AthlonXP1800's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4,352
Default Re: Far Cry shows how pitiful GeForceFX is in DX9 games

Originally Posted by Malficar

I certainly agree ATI has better DX9. We all know how Nvidia screwed this up. Maybe I have selective memory but I have not seen a review where ATI doubles the Nvidia FPS numbers in Far Cry. Even so I own products from both companies and I am of the honest opinion that while my ATI card beats my Nvidia card in almost all FPS comparisons, the Nvidia product runs with less micro pauses. I have two indentical rigs, save the video cards, one had a 5700u in it, the other has a 9800pro by ATI with the new 4.3 cats.

I also feel as Nutty does, 1280x960 is it for res/textures I love that setting.
Here you go again, it is wrong to compare 5700 Ultra to 9800 Pro, you should compare it at the same level with 5900 Ultra, it not fair to compare the high end card to a mainstream card or such as NV40 and RV360.
Intel Core i7 3770K, Corsair H80 liquid cooler with Noctua S12-1200 fan, ASUS P8Z77V with UEFI 2104, 16GB Samsung Green 30nm DDR3-RAM, Pioneer BDR-S09XLT 16x Blu-ray writer, Corsair AX850 PSU, Western Digital 2TB SATA3 hard drive, CanonScan LiDE 210 scanner, Microsoft Internet Keyboard, Microsoft Touch Explorer mouse, 32inch Sharp LC32LE600 LED TV, EVGA Geforce GTX 670 SC 4GB with Geforce 370.50 driver, 50Mb broadband Virgin Media VMDG480 Super Hub, Aspire Xplorer Midi Tower, Windows 8.1 Pro 64bit.
AthlonXP1800 is offline   Reply With Quote