View Single Post
Old 05-15-04, 01:47 AM   #26
freak77power
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 130
Default Re: I Played FarCry with Pixel Shader 3.0

Quote:
Originally Posted by hovz
while i admit 25 fps isnt optimal and ever since nv30 i tend to prefer ati, i have to admit those pics are a clear improvement. how can u say those pics dont look good? im suprised u said far cry looks better than stalker. how about far cry v CS and doom 3. i know they only showed the xbox version, but u must have previously seen the pc version because u obviously have connections. what about half life v doom3.
Of course they are improvement over PS1.1, what we actually saw with NV3x. But, for me it's not. I'm having that image quality since I owned Radeon 9700Pro and now Radeon 9800XT...Once your eyes get used to, it's actually nothing special

But, I like the way NVIDIA pushes industry. The introduced PS3.0, and it will force ATI to do with next product line. PS3.0 brings a lot....
I wish I see some games with thousands instructions, huge complexity
__________________
Intel P4 3.06 533FSB P4T533 768MB RDRAM PC-1066-32bit Radeon 9800XT 256 Creative Audigy 2ZS
3DMark03 6620 - the one of the best scores on non overclocked system, with default settings.
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2333838
freak77power is offline   Reply With Quote