Originally Posted by anzak
Posts like this make me sick. The NV40 does not suck in PS 2.0. In the 3dmark PS2.0 test the 6800 is about 25% faster than the X800XT. SM3.0 does lead to fast PS2.0 performance, just like SM2 leads to faster PS1.1 performance. Im not saying the X800 is slow in PS2.0 but it's not as fast as the 6800 in this case.
by this cas eu mean specifically 3d mark right? because the x800xt IS faster at ps 2.0 than nv40. theres not even an arguement. its also a fact that nv40 is slower at 3.0 than 2.0, just like atis card will be when its released. just like both cards are slower at 2.0 than 1.1. its so sad that people think that using shader 3.0 will actually increase performance.