View Single Post
Old 11-10-02, 09:51 AM   #8
bwkaz
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,262
Default

Quote:
Consider your request received; we'll investigate better solutions for a future release.
Well, OK, at least they're thinking about it.

Maybe setitimer() would be another possibility, rather than usleep()? (and actually, re-reading the usleep() manpage, I see that whoever wrote it is saying to use nanosleep() instead. I wonder if there are the same scheduling issues with that...)

Good luck in any case...
__________________
Registered Linux User #219692
bwkaz is offline