View Single Post
Old 07-24-04, 12:51 AM   #32
therapture
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 226
Default Re: Far Cry benchmark

Quote:
Originally Posted by betterdan
Using 61.76 drivers WITHOUT enabling any 3.0 support. No AA or AF, Max settings.

Resolution: 1280×1024
Maximum quality option, Direct3D renderer
Level: Pier, demo: 1.tmd

Score = 47.17 FPS

...

Resolution: 1280×1024
Maximum quality option, Direct3D renderer
Level: Steam, demo: hocsteam.tmd

Score = 40.56 FPS

...

Resolution: 1280×1024
Maximum quality option, Direct3D renderer
Level: Regulator, demo: tr1-regulator.tmd

Score = 35.40 FPS

...

Resolution: 1280×1024
Maximum quality option, Direct3D renderer
Level: Volcano, demo: hocvolcano.tmd

Score = 67.62 FPS

...

Resolution: 1280×1024
Maximum quality option, Direct3D renderer
Level: Research, demo: 3dnews001.tmd

Score = 41.83 FPS

I am actually playing the game at 1280x1024 4xAA and 4xAF everything maxed and it runs pretty damn smooth. I like it

That last demo is kind of weird. It runs faster as **** but shows a small fps. Weird.

Wow, our scores are so close as to be within the range of normal deviation. Even the ram speed is about the same...I think Far Cry seems to gain fps with overall bus speed, plus the A64 cpu's are jamming...
__________________
- Westinghouse LVM-37WSE 37", Core2 Duo E6750 @3200mhz, Gigabyte GA-965-DS3 rev 3.3, Tt Big Typhoon, 8gb G-Skill DDR-2 1000, BFG GTX260-OC, 630gb total SATA, Sony DVD-RW SATA, Thermaltake Tsunami, Logitech G11 and MX518, Vista64 Ultimate
therapture is offline   Reply With Quote