View Single Post
Old 10-10-04, 10:13 AM   #33
cereal killer
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: indiana
Posts: 1,042
Default Re: CS Source is a crap

Originally Posted by faraday
Well gosh if Id's employees say the D3 engine rocks then by all means, it must be true

A good software must be scalable, meaning that it can run today pretty well, and tomorrow even better, with added features etc.
Problem with D3 is that I wouldn't define it as running well today, it doesn't run like crap either but I just wasn't impressed.
HL2 graphics wont be as good (arguably) as D3's, but I believe it will be a much better game.

As for farcry, I definitly enjoy CS:Source graphics better than Farcry's, I'm not sayingt they're better, only saying I preffer source's.

As far as the D3's engine capabilities for vehicles open areas etc, I was hoping they'd use it more in Quake4 , but from the preview it almost looked like D3 all over again, I sure hope I'm wrong
I thought D3 ran great. No problems here.

System #1
CPU INTEL|3rd gen I-7@3.7ghz
16gb memory Windows 7 home premium 64 bit
PSU Siverstone Zeus 850w
EVGA 660gtx
Logitech G400 gaming mouse
Dell 2407WFP 24" lcd

Video Games -- Why waste good technology on science and medicine?
PSYCHODAD is offline   Reply With Quote