View Single Post
Old 10-22-04, 04:43 PM   #15
Subtestube's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 1,365
Default Re: Tim Sweeney V.S. John Carmack

I tend towards Carmack... he's just so damn good. Half the things that are possible in PC graphics currently are mainly possible because of him. I even cited him in a graphics research project. In addition, it's my experience that Carmack graphics engines are significantly more efficient than Sweeney based ones. That's not to say that Sweeney is no good, but Carmack is a little better in my opinion - his wealth of knowledge and understanding of the graphics field really makes that little bit of difference [to me].
Dr Possible: Core 2 Duo E6400 on Gigabyte GA-965P-DS4. Galaxy GeForce 7600GT. 2GB Corsair XMS 2 DDR2-6400 RAM (CL5). ATi Theatre 550 Pro. Windows XP MCE. All stored in Piano black Antec Sonata II, with a broken door.

Mobile: ASUS M2400N, Pentium M 1.5 GHz. 512 MB DDR RAM. Intel EXTREME graphics. Windows XP SP 2 / Ubuntu 5.10.

Ridiculous DOES not have an 'e' in it. It comes from "ridicule" and has less than nothing to do with the colour red.
Subtestube is offline   Reply With Quote