Re: 7664 and 1600x1200 (maximum pixel clock?)
I have the same problem as you all described and had to drop my refresh rate in order to have my 1920x1200 resolution.
Is this a *bug* or a *fix*?! With this lower pixel clock I run only at about 55Hz. I remember when my system came stock with winxp the refresh rate was around 75Hz, that would be the refresh rate if I had the 350MHz pixel clock.
Is this *feature* here to stay? If so, does that mean for the last two years I have been over-refreshing my screen? I don't see any damage, everything looks as good as new so what's the problem?
I still find I cannot wake my system with the new driver. The screen just doesn't come back. I had no problems with the previous driver. Some other *feature* I am unaware of?