View Single Post
Old 02-12-03, 08:20 AM   #79
Lars
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 118
Default

This is definetely not a gamers benchmark. It's a videocard benchmark allright, so I think that's what they should call it. I have seen systems running with 1+ Ghz lower cpu speed than I and still outscoring me because their R9700PRO was clocked like 10 Mhz higher....

And a 1 Ghz P3 with a R9700PRO outscoring a 2.4+ Ghz P4 with a Ti4600 I know for sure which rig I'd rather play games on. It'll be interesting to see what the entire gaming community will end up thinking about this one.

Btw my score is 5436 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=39178

.... and it doesn't change unless I change the speed on the R9700PRO. Even 600 Mhz less on the cpu hardly changed the score at all.....
__________________
Pentium E6600 ES 2.4@3.5 Ghz | Mach II GT | Asus P5WD2-E | 2GB Corsair PC5400UL | X-Fi Fata1ity
Viewsonic VP201s + Dell 2001FP | 2x Club3D x1900xt CF | 2x WD Raptors | PCP&C 850W PSU
3dmark2001se 62845 | 3dmark05 20043 | 3dmark06 11642 | 3dmark03 36921 | pcmark05 9754
Lars is offline   Reply With Quote