View Single Post
Old 02-14-03, 10:27 AM   #94
ElMoIsEviL
Registered User
 
ElMoIsEviL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 6
Default

I agree, from what I see 3D Mark 2003 is very video card dependant.

I like this seeing as we're essentially compairing our video cards. And in all honesty a Pentium IV 2.4Ghz with a TNT2 M64 video card will not be faster then an Athlon 900Mhz with a Radeon 9500 Pro.

It's a synthetic benchmark that actually uses some of the futur options that will be available. The thing is games will never fully be DX9.0, they will always keep some elements of DX8.1 and 7.0a.

Unreal 2 is mostly a DX 7.0a game with some features like Cube mapping etc that are DX8.0. They only raised the polygon levels.
Which is why it's good to see Futuremark keep some DX7.0 level tests in there benchmark suite.

Are nVidia cards at a disadvantage? Yes, because they're technologically inferior on the DirectX features side (not the GeForceFX but all the ones that came before) they have issues running games that are built on Pixel shader 1.4.

It might sound funny but the GeForce4Ti is inferior technology wise to even an R200 (Radeon 8500) when it comes to Pixel Shaders, Anisotropic filtering and overall Image quality. The GeForce4Ti does however possess a stronger Vertex shading engine seeing as it's using 2 of them in parrallel as well as having higher clock speeds and a better memory controller (it's a crossbar memory controller).

So before we go judge the performance of the GeForce4Ti is these tests we have agree that it does not have the technological support to achieve higher scores.

The difference between the GeForceFX and all the older GeForce cards is staggering. It's a completely redesigned architecture that was built to be very ATi-like in respects to making it more futurproof.
The Radeon 9700 Pro is very nvidia-like with respects to being very brute in force. Using a better memory controller(the best in the industry) as well as having a better performance to Mhz ratio (astounding can you imagine an R300 clocked at 500Mhz?).

Take it or leave it 3D Mark 2003 is here to stay. It's now the Dawn of Cinematic rendering thanks to R300.u
__________________
DFI Lanparty UT NF4 SLI-DR | AMD Athlon64 X2 4800+ @ 3.2GHz (291x11)(Swiftech MCW5002-64T 226W Pelt) | 2GB OCZ Platinum EL XTC PC4000 DDR 1:1 @ 3-3-3-8 3.0v! | ATi Radeon X1900XTX 512MB (Alphacool NexXxoS NVXP-3 Waterblock) | Sound Blaster X-Fi FaT@l1Ty FPS Sound Card | 2x74GB WD Raptor 10,000 RPM RAID0 | 2x250GB Maxtor Maxline III 7,200 RPM RAID0 | 2x74GB Quantum Atlas III SCSI 10,000 RPM | SuperCooled: Enterprise Custom Cooling

Asus A8R-MVP /vmod | AMD Athlon64 X2 3800+ @ 2.8GHz (10x280) | 2x1024MB PQI PC4200 Performance DDR (1:1) | Asus EN7900GTX 512MB | Sound Blaster X-Fi Xtreme Music Sound Card | 1x250GB Seagate 7200.9 8MB Cache HD
ElMoIsEviL is offline   Reply With Quote