View Single Post
Old 02-15-03, 10:14 PM   #90
Kruno
TypeDef's assistant
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,641
Send a message via ICQ to Kruno Send a message via AIM to Kruno
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by StealthHawk
does anyone have numbers for a r8500 or r9000 using PS1.4 vs PS1.1?

the way i see it, if the true DX8 gen cards from ATI gain nothing from PS1.4, there really is no reason to code in PS1.4. after all, from what i'm hearing, the r8500 (and by extension i assume the r9000 falls into this case) performs poorly, even with PS1.4 being used.

what this means is that the real cards benefitting in the DX8 games tests(ie GT2 and 3) are the DX9 generation of ATI cards, r9500 and r9700. and of course presumably the gfFX, as people say that if you support PS2.0 you also support PS1.4.

i really don't see why PS1.4 should be supported as a DX8 baseline if DX8 cards don't gain any benefit, so the conclusion really depends on the answer to my question. unless of course, PS1.4 is easier to code than PS1.1
Well if it is true that they render less polys in 3dmark then will that not benefit?
__________________
"Never before has any voice dared to utter the words of that tongue in Imladris, Mr. Anderson" - Elrond LOTR
Kruno is offline   Reply With Quote