View Single Post
Old 02-17-03, 11:49 AM   #23
noko's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Orlando Florida
Posts: 735

Part of DX9 ps2.0 is also ps1.4, 1.3 - 1.1. Meaning if parts of the benchmark is using ps1.4 is because that is all that is required for rendering that stage or even 1.1 version, it is all part of DX9 spec. That doesn't make it less then a DX9 benchmark. 3dMark03 supports most pixel shaders inherit in DX9 and uses the best one available for your card. Why penalize cards with ps1.4 support just because your card doesn't have it. Now some effects did require vs2.0 and ps2.0 to work reasonalbly where as ps1.4 and 1.1 with multiple passes wouldn't work. As for why FutureMark didn't use ps1.3? Well it just doesn't give you much more of anything is the bottom line.
Gigabit DSL, Q6600 @ 3.4ghz, Mushkin 4gb DDR 800 OCZ 2x2gb , PowerColor HD 5870. 24" Acer LCD, 1TB hd with Vista 64 Home Premium.

Foxconn 780G, Athlon64 X2 5600 @ 3ghz, Mushkin 4gb DDR 800 OCZ 2x2gb , eVga 260 GTX. 17" MagAcer LCD, 120gb Vista 32
noko is offline   Reply With Quote