View Single Post
Old 02-26-03, 08:28 AM   #42
digitalwanderer's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Highland, IN USA
Posts: 4,944

Originally posted by K.I.L.E.R
2k3 is 2300.

? No, it's 2003...isn't it?

What's 2003 then?

EDITED BITS: I posted this before I noticed there was a second page where this was already thoroughly discussed. I gotta stop posting before my first pot of coffee.

Can we just agree to disagree on this one? I'm gonna stick with the 3dm2k3 labelling convention just 'cause it seems to work with the way I referred to their past attempts as 3dm2k & 3dm2k1se.
[SIZE=1][I]"It was very important to us that NVIDIA did not know exactly where to aim. As a result they seem to have over-engineered in some aspects creating a power-hungry monster which is going to be very expensive for them to manufacture. We have a beautifully balanced piece of hardware that beats them on pure performance, cost, scalability, future mobile relevance, etc. That's all because they didn't know what to aim at."
-R.Huddy[/I] [/SIZE]

Last edited by digitalwanderer; 02-26-03 at 08:32 AM.
digitalwanderer is offline   Reply With Quote