View Single Post
Old 02-27-03, 06:49 PM   #39
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,293

Originally posted by Hellbinder
The problem with you making statements like this, is that if the Shoe was on the Other Foot. you would be talking about how inferior FP16 was. You would even be talking about how inferior FP24 was if the Nv30 has deliverd FP32 as promised.
Hellbinder, I was talking about how I didn't think FP32 would be useful quite a bit before the release of the Radeon 9700 Pro. Some others pointed out the non-color data problems, but I still think that color data will, in the vast majority of situations, show no improvement above FP16.

I could post a handfull of quotes from you Right now from B3D from about the Time of the R300 launch where you Question wether the R300 should even be considered a True DX9 card. All becuase of its 96bit color.
Be my guest. I always said 96-bit should be enough for nearly everything.

You're imagining things, Hellbinder.
"Physics is like sex. Sure, it may give some practical results, but that's not why we do it." - Richard P. Feynman
Chalnoth is offline   Reply With Quote