Originally posted by ChrisRay
It wasn't an argument but rather than a fact until it was dragged out by someone who shall remain nameless. Its common knowledge that the r300 is more limited from a programmability function point of view.
Its not as much the instructions that bother me but the limited methods of Pixel Shader precision. I'm Going to college to become a graphic engineer so these things are relevent to me.
Anywho, As I said, it wasn't an argument rather than a fact that the r300 offered more limited programmability features than the r350 and the NV30 series.
And frankly. It was never meant to be more than that.
Sorry, I meant "argument" as in "line of reasoning", rather than an argument with someone else.