|
|
#1 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3
|
hi,
if i open gnome-terminal, maximize it and open a text file, and begin to scroll in the file up and down, it's slow. by slow i mean it jumps to the next line in around 0.5 seconds. this happens when using the newest (4349) nvidia binary drivers ( "nvidia" in XF86Config ). if i switch to the xfree driver ("nv") it's a lot faster. and if i switch to the 3xxx nvidia drivers, gnome-terminal becomes the fastest. why? i've read somewhere that gnome uses some calls that got rewritten when nvidia drivers went from 3xxx => 4xxx.. i tried RenderAccel=true, nothing changed. i tried to switch to agpgart or to nvidia agp, nothing .. athlon-tbird, 1Ghz motherboard with sis735 chipset cat /proc/driver/nvidia/cards/0: ----------------------------------------- Model: GeForce4 Ti 4400 IRQ: 5 Video BIOS: 04.25.00.22.44 Card Type: AGP ----------------------------------------- geforce4 with 128mb ram xfree 4.3 gentoo linux nvidia drivers:4349 thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,262
|
Out of curiosity, what did you do to "set RenderAccel=true"? From the way you said that, it almost sounds like you tried to set an environment variable... is this the case?
__________________
Registered Linux User #219692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3
|
no
![]() from my XF86Config: Section "Device" Identifier "nvidia-generic" Driver "nvidia" Option "NvAGP" "1" Option "RenderAccel" "true" EndSection ![]() btw. is renderaccel-true working for you? it helps? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,262
|
I don't know about whether or not it helps (seeing as I don't use either Gnome or KDE, being a twm and Eterm person myself, I haven't ever seen what you're talking about happen), but I am using "RenderAccel" "true", yes.
I'm wondering if it isn't just bloat in gnome-terminal. Does Eterm do the same thing (if you have it), or xterm if you don't?
__________________
Registered Linux User #219692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3
|
well, xterm is a lot faster than gnome-terminal when using the 4349 drivers.
the point is: 1. with 3123 drivers gnome-terminal is as fast (maybe faster) as xterm 2. with xfree's nvidia driver ('nv') gnome-terminal is faster than with the 4349 drivers. i think this shouldn't happen. of course i can go and fill a bugreport at gnome.org but i thought that maybe this is a driver issue. before you ask: i want transparency+utf8. that's why i can't use xterm(no transparency) or eterm(no utf8) |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,262
|
Yeah, Gnome will probably tell you it's a driver problem...
![]() Don't know what to say.
__________________
Registered Linux User #219692 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|