|
|
#1 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3
|
Hi you all,
I'm running a display wall. It contains 12 (4x3 - 30inches) screens (2560x1600px each), 6 hp9300 nodes (bi opterons dual cores, 16Gb RAM, with nVidia G70GL [Quadro FX4500]) to pilot the screens, one other hp9300 to control the others. Everything with an infiniband network. To control the wall, I'm using the last version of everything, including xorg-server 1.2 and Xdmx. I have posted my entire configuration here : http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p...1.html#3905761 My problems are : - The refresh is slow. When I move a big window (something around 8000 pixel width), it's not fluid. - When I try to zoom or move a big (more than 15000 px width) picture in gimp, the refreshment is long. It's not a bandwidth problem (the infiniband bw is quite empty), but it seems to be more a XputImage and XgetImage problem (Xorg internal functions used to send images). I've found that using Xperf and gdb but I'm not a X core hacker, so, it's dificult to detect if it is those function which cause the problem. Maybe it's a gimp way to refresh, because the display is quickest with gkview for example. Does the e17 team works on those optimisations (with imlib2, ecore, .. ) ? - Glx doesn't works well. using glxgears, I can get 25 000fps on each node, but 500 fps using the display wall. I know that glxgears is not parallelised, but, 24000 fps it's an huge difference !! So, beryl doesn't works either (just thru the wall, it's ok on each node). - Every 3D (as openinventor, googleearth..) crash. I cannot understand why. It seems to work with only 3 nodes, but not on 6. So, I'm looking for advices, tips, hints, anything to get this working. Every idea is welcome ! Thanx, Greg. ps : Scuse my english, it's not my native language. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3
|
Oh, I forgot.
I'm using the last nvidia-drivers (1.0.9746). Code:
[i] x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers
Available versions: 1.0.8776 (~)1.0.9631 (~)1.0.9746
Installed versions: 1.0.9746(12:36:28 02/09/07)(dlloader kernel_linux)
Homepage: http://www.nvidia.com/
Description: NVIDIA X11 driver and GLX libraries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
#!/?*
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 662
|
wow... nice setup! Do you have some pics?
But don't forget to read the stickys... (nvidia-bug-report.log) If you have a problem, PLEASE read this first |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3
|
Quote:
With an nvidia pics on the wall display or anything else !Here are my nvidia-bug-reports for the master and one slave. Greg. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
NVIDIA Corporation
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,763
|
I have a few questions:
0) How are you tying all of the X screens together between these systems? Are you using Framelock cards? 1) It is fully expected that there will be a non-trivial performance loss when using the Composite extension (especially on large desktops, such as you are using). This is because using a compositor requires that everything be first rendered off screen before getting composited back onto the visible desktop (effectively twice as much rendering). Do the performance problems persist if you're not using the Composite extension? 2) You stated that every 3D application crashes. Is this only when using more than 3 nodes or regardless of the number of nodes? Thanks, Lonni |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Stubborn screen res problem | Alpsoandso | NVIDIA Linux | 6 | 05-03-12 06:00 PM |
| 302.07 (beta) for Linux x86/x86_64 released | AaronP | NVIDIA Linux | 0 | 05-02-12 09:55 AM |
| Glx | mrbig1344 | NVIDIA Linux | 7 | 09-30-02 06:45 AM |
| Desperate for help with Display problems!!!!! | Petz | NVIDIA Linux | 12 | 09-18-02 07:26 PM |