|
|
#25 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 17,986
|
24931 at default settings. This time the only app I had running in the background was IE7 w/ only 1 tab open (nVnews).
18837 w/ everything maxed (1920x1440, 16xAA, 16xAF, TAA & GCAA enabled, etc). Seems a bit low to me. Hmm... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 14
|
Hmmmm....
A bit low is an understatement. Those are the type of scores I'm getting, low to mid 20s. This card should easily be nearly double. Redeemed: how does it perform for you in the games you mentioned? (I'm assuming you have the 8800GTS, right? What are your system specs? Please share.) This is troubling because I cannot move on to useful workloads until I know it is running correctly. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 17,986
|
Quote:
![]() I'm running a s754 3400 on the EPoX 8NPA-Sli mobo, with 2GB DDR500 ram (@ DDR500). I know my CPU is a huge bottleneck for theset two cards (yes, I'm running dual 8800GTSs). But in '01 I doubt my CPU would be that huge of an issue. So I'm not sure what the culprit is. Latest drivers, latest BIOS update, etc. I'm going to be upgrading in a few weeks to a better setup (ASUS A8N32 SLi mobo+ Opty 185) and I'll re-test then to see if that changes anything. I'm wanting to run Vista x64 (Ultimate) on that setup so I'll try it under XP and Vista to see what's up. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
R.I.P. Babe Thread
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 12,387
|
I scored a 30105 with max settings, vsync off, but it was with the basic free version of 3dmark2001se.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 17,986
|
Quote:
Anyhow, I don't fare very well in any of the 3DMark tests. In '03 I get about 30k actually, but that's the only one where my score is kinda' high. Who knows why my scores are so low. My game performance is definitely a lot better than my 3DMark scores would indicate though, so I'm happy. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
R.I.P. Babe Thread
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 12,387
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 | |
|
.<<o>>.
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Finland
Posts: 4,763
|
Quote:
3dmark01 should only be used to test the performance of your cpu, while 3dmark06 is better suited for testing gpu performance. I bet that even a 9800pro could get the same score as you on the same cpu. ![]()
__________________
: :Benq FP241W : : Optoma HD80 Projector + 92" Screen : : Genelec 8020B speakers : : Sony MDR-XB700 Headphones : : Razer Lycosa : : Razer Lachesis : : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 14
|
Quick followup in case any one else runs into similar issues..
Two problems were discovered. First my motherboard was "broken". It did not have the correct chipset/configuration that should have been part of its PCB revision. Second, agreed the 2001se score is more CPU limited than GPU, but in this case the FSB was running only 1/2 speed due to this Dempsey model. This was not tied to power consumption, or insufficient current. |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 17,986
|
Quote:
![]() My bad. But that makes perfect sense. This CPU won't oc any more (running it at 2.5 from 2.4) so- oh well. Got the Opty185 already- just waiting on the new mobo. ![]() Thanks again man! ![]() |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Nvidia 173.14.35: Fedora 17 x86 terribly slow | Mr Wolf | NVIDIA Linux | 25 | 07-02-12 01:44 AM |
| Gnome3 with composite is very slow on Geforce FX 5200 with 173.14.31 driver | Artox | NVIDIA Linux | 0 | 05-26-12 10:33 AM |
| Very slow X startup | Jeremy | NVIDIA Linux | 96 | 05-23-03 10:11 AM |
| Slow XP startup after upgrade.... | Ramshambo2001 | Microsoft Windows XP And Vista | 10 | 10-10-02 01:35 AM |