05-28-03, 12:02 AM
|
#1 | |
|
NV420
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 446
|
My thoughts on Futuremark's response
I think Futuremark was very nice to give nVIDIA a second chance to do the rendering right even after nVIDIA made such cheats in 3Dmark2003. I want to see nVIDIA's response to this. Futuremark didn't take sides. They were just trying to make their benchmark valid.
|
|
|
|
|
05-28-03, 05:21 AM
|
#2 | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It wasn't really Futuremark's "reponse." It was a forum post(kinda .plan stlye though) from the Producer of 3dmark03.
|
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| User Response : PR Response to Linus Torvald's Inflammatory Comments | Blackcrack | NVIDIA Linux | 16 | 06-29-12 04:57 AM |
| PR Response to Linus Torvald's Inflammatory Comments | News | Latest Tech And Game Headlines | 0 | 06-19-12 12:00 AM |
| PR Response to Linus Torvald's Inflammatory Comments | MikeC | NVIDIA Linux | 0 | 06-18-12 10:14 PM |
| Microsoft overhauls certificate management in response to Flame PKI hack | News | Latest Tech And Game Headlines | 0 | 06-12-12 03:30 PM |
