Go Back   nV News Forums > Linux Support Forums > NVIDIA Linux

Newegg Daily Deals

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-24-07, 11:58 PM   #1
ptc
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2
Default Disappointing 3D Performance 6200/AGP

I've recently upgraded from a Geforce4Ti (128MB) and a 1280x1024 LCD (VGA) to a Geforce FX6200 (256MB) and a 1650x1050 LCD (DVI). I also upgraded from the "legacy" driver to the current 100.14.19 (and now .23 beta) driver. Rest of my (SUSE 10.3-based) setup has remained the same. This is not the most recent setup, I know, but should be enough for my needs.

The only thing I noticed at first is that finally KDE3 composite effects (transparency and so on) work. I mention this as it might be related?!?

However, 3D graphics seems to have gotten more sluggish. "glxgears" - I know this isn't the best possible benchmark - gives only about 500 FPS, down from several thousand before.

I also tried once more the about only 3D game I play - Neverwinter Nights. It's an old game, and it worked quite flawlessly with high detail settings with the Geforce4Ti. I thought it should be no problem with the new GFX card, despite the higher resolution.
Not that NWN stutters now, basically graphics work, but the game seems to react rather sluggish to my mouse movements in the 3D environment. I can't pinpoint lower FPS or something like that, it simply "feels" much slower (with the same high detail settings as before).

Have I configured something wrong?
ptc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-07, 03:32 AM   #2
Thunderbird
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Netherlands, Europe
Posts: 2,105
Default Re: Disappointing 3D Performance 6200/AGP

A geforce6200 doesn't have to be faster than your current card.

First of all you need a relatively powerful cpu to take full advantage of the 6200. You current cpu might be forming a bottleneck which could be holding it back.

Second one of the confusing things is that there are 'highend' 6200 boads with 128-bit memory and high clocks and lowend boards (which are these the only ones left) running with 64bit memory and relatively low clocks. Just between the highend and the lowend boards there is about a big performance difference (~50%).

It is most likely a combination of the 'poor' 64bit 6200 board with a relatively weak cpu that causes your geforce4ti to be faster.
Thunderbird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-07, 03:38 AM   #3
a7v
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 67
Default Re: Disappointing 3D Performance 6200/AGP

Well, the 6200 aren't that much faster then a Ti4 anyway, the 6200 actually has a lower texture fill rate.
Does NWN run better if you turn off the KDE composite effects?

Depending on which version of Xorg you are using there are also some xorg.conf options relating to GLX and Composite. See the README.txt.gz that is included with the drivers, on my Debian box it's in /usr/share/doc/nvidia-glx.
__________________
Computer stuff I've owned at one time or another:
CPUs: K6-3 400, Duron 600, Thunderbird 1400, Barton 2500, Duron 1800, A-64 3700+, C2D E7200
Motherboards: Shuttle Via MVP, Asus A7V, Asus A7V133, Asus N8X-VM400, Abit NF7, Abit UL8, Asus P5Q Pro
Graphics Cards: TNT2, GF 2 MX, GF 2 Pro, GF4 MX, GF FX 5500, GF 6600, GF 7600 GT, GF 9800GT
a7v is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-07, 11:03 AM   #4
ptc
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2
Default Re: Disappointing 3D Performance 6200/AGP

Thanks for the advice. You're right, it's a 64bit memory interface (I basically wanted a cheap gfx board without fan for non-gamer setup).
However, judging from different benchmarks found on the web, I thought that even that 6200 would at least at par with the old (and loudly coolded) 4Ti.

Strangely enough, disabling composte effects in KDE makes NWN flicker intolerable. So I couldn't try it out.

glxgears, however, goes up from 500 FPS to 2000FPS (still much lower than with the 4Ti), but looks still slow.

However, 256MB local memory should be enough for glxgears to run without slowing down? The CPU ist a Athlon64 3000+, not the newest brand, but should suffice...
ptc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-07, 11:16 AM   #5
netllama
NVIDIA Corporation
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,763
Default Re: Disappointing 3D Performance 6200/AGP

glxgears is not a benchmark. Its numerical output is completely useless for proving anything, other than glxgears is running.
netllama is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Disk Performance Expectations vs. Reality News Archived News Items 0 05-27-12 03:00 PM
Boost Your Performance Goals 10x ' This Week on inside* Publications News Archived News Items 0 05-13-12 05:20 PM
NVIDIA Unleashes the GeForce GTX 670 Graphics Card ' Performance Perfected (WCCFTECH) News GeForce GTX 670 Reviews 0 05-10-12 08:40 AM
My UT2003 Tweak Guide DXnfiniteFX Gaming Central 48 10-30-02 11:59 PM
so let's try this again in the new forum - bad performance with correctly inst.driver neutrino NVIDIA Linux 11 08-01-02 04:19 PM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2014, nV News.