Go Back   nV News Forums > Software Forums > Gaming Central > Crysis

Newegg Daily Deals

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-28-08, 09:25 PM   #13
wizkid
*BANNED*
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 33
Default Re: Crysis Warhead DX9 VS DX10

Quote:
Originally Posted by $n][pErMan View Post
AA and Vsync are working for me in DX9 mode... Maybe its because im using older drivers?
Works for me just fine and im using the newest officials.
wizkid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-08, 07:16 PM   #14
gerardfraser
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 237
Default Re: Crysis Warhead DX9 VS DX10

Quote:
Originally Posted by skullbr View Post
Doesn't work for me.. its clear in roads that AA is OFF.....

BTW, gerardfraser, what program are you using in the sidebar to show all those info about your pc?
Hey there the program is called Everest
http://www.lavalys.com/
gerardfraser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-08, 10:27 PM   #15
Acid Rain
What a sweet little...
 
Acid Rain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: West Coast, USA.
Posts: 1,248
Default Re: Crysis Warhead DX9 VS DX10

Quote:
Originally Posted by mailman2 View Post
Once again DX10 loses. When are we gonna see this extra speed, less clutter come through?
In DX9 the physics are nerfed, though, aren't they? I won't play in 9, but a buddy said the physics are nerfed. I geuss I'll check it out...
__________________
MY PIG
MB: GA-EP45-UD3P
CPU: Q6600 (SLACR)
RAM: 4GB KHX6400D2LLK2
3D Porkware: Radeon HD 4890
OS: Windows 7 Ultimate 64 with MSE
Aux Equipment: Phase-B Nanocycloptics
Acid Rain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-08, 12:38 AM   #16
Soetdjuret
Teh lazy swede
 
Soetdjuret's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Svea
Posts: 1,982
Default Re: Crysis Warhead DX9 VS DX10

It's not nerfed... u can have the same physis in dx10.
Soetdjuret is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-08, 12:03 AM   #17
aceflier
Bringer of teh Welt
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 197
Default Re: Crysis Warhead DX9 VS DX10

Either crap dx10 optimization or crap dx10sli?

Image taken 1920x1080 all settings enthusiasts 4xAA

DX10


DX9


I do like the dx10 motion blur but at this setting its unplayable for me less than 28fps in the last battle.
__________________
2600K 4.9ghz 1.38v
2X Palit gtx560ti 2gb 1000/2000
8gb 1600mhz Kingston HyperX
128gb Crusial Real SSD
750gb WD Black
Buggy wife RMA next week
Vantage P43697 3DMarks
3D Mark 11 P10008
aceflier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-08, 07:17 AM   #18
FastRedPonyCar
Resident Tire Destroyer
 
FastRedPonyCar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 3,012
Send a message via AIM to FastRedPonyCar
Default Re: Crysis Warhead DX9 VS DX10

Dude it's a well known fact since the first week crysis was released that you get a significant drop in FPS when running in DX10.

Just use a custom configuration file like everyone else and run the game in DX9 mode. The blur effect may not be quite up to par with DX10 rendering but you'll get everything else DX10 offers.
__________________
- Desktop -
4770k @ 4.45 ghz - ASUS Gryphon Mobo - 16 gigs Corsair Vengeance Pro 1866 RAM - XSPC Rasa 750 RS240 H2o Cooling - EVGA GTX 680 @1325mhz - 128 gig Crucial RealSSD C300 - 150 gig Velociraptor +2.75 Terrabytes of WD Sata 3.0 storage - 910 watt PC P&C PSU - Corsair Obsidian 650D case

- Server -
Core I7 D0 revision 920 @ 3.75 ghz - ASUS P6T Deluxe - 12 Gigs Mushkin DDR3 1600 - Corsair HX 620 PSU - Noctua NH-U9B cooler - Coolermaster WaveMaster Case

- Laptop -
MSI 16F2-012
- i7 2630QM - GTX570m @ 750Mhz - 8 gigs HyperX 1866 - 120 gig OCZ Vertex 3 SSD- 750 gig Scorpio Black - BluRay - 95% Gamut Screen - IC Diamond goop
FastRedPonyCar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-08, 07:47 AM   #19
Tr1cK
not coming back
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,872
Default Re: Crysis Warhead DX9 VS DX10

I can't wait til people quit making a fuss over this ****ty engine.
Tr1cK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-08, 08:11 AM   #20
FastRedPonyCar
Resident Tire Destroyer
 
FastRedPonyCar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 3,012
Send a message via AIM to FastRedPonyCar
Default Re: Crysis Warhead DX9 VS DX10

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tr1cK View Post
I can't wait til people quit making a fuss over this ****ty engine.
The engine itself is absolutely astonishing. The physics have their quirks here and there but by and large, they just released the engine too soon IMO. I think the 8800 GTS/GTX cards should have been the minimum required card to run this game and I think that waiting until now would have been a better choice to help reduce the amount of gamers they forced to run at very low resolutions.

I'm dissapointed at the DX10 performance but then again, every game that is DX10 capable runs slower in DX10 mode except for the unreal engine games like GOW and Bioshock but those stay locked at 60 fps all the time so the machine really isn't being challenged in the first place.

I think Clear sky is a step in the right direction but the FPS difference in games like call of juarez, lost planet, crysis, etc when using DX10 vs DX9 is night and day difference in performance.

Makes me think it's not these game engines fault but DX10's fault.. or maybe just a fundamental lack of understanding of DX10 coding. Who knows. I'm no coder so I don't know much about any of that. All I know is that the unreal engine is the only engine that can successfully run in DX10 mode without a major drop in FPS.
__________________
- Desktop -
4770k @ 4.45 ghz - ASUS Gryphon Mobo - 16 gigs Corsair Vengeance Pro 1866 RAM - XSPC Rasa 750 RS240 H2o Cooling - EVGA GTX 680 @1325mhz - 128 gig Crucial RealSSD C300 - 150 gig Velociraptor +2.75 Terrabytes of WD Sata 3.0 storage - 910 watt PC P&C PSU - Corsair Obsidian 650D case

- Server -
Core I7 D0 revision 920 @ 3.75 ghz - ASUS P6T Deluxe - 12 Gigs Mushkin DDR3 1600 - Corsair HX 620 PSU - Noctua NH-U9B cooler - Coolermaster WaveMaster Case

- Laptop -
MSI 16F2-012
- i7 2630QM - GTX570m @ 750Mhz - 8 gigs HyperX 1866 - 120 gig OCZ Vertex 3 SSD- 750 gig Scorpio Black - BluRay - 95% Gamut Screen - IC Diamond goop
FastRedPonyCar is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 10-03-08, 08:13 AM   #21
Logical
Registered User
 
Logical's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,523
Default Re: Crysis Warhead DX9 VS DX10

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tr1cK View Post
I can't wait til people quit making a fuss over this ****ty engine.
+1

I can neither understand the fuss of such a badly optimised game. If i wanted to stare at palm trees and water all day i would have a pic of the maldives on my desktop.

/puts on flameproof jacket
Logical is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-08, 01:09 PM   #22
Soetdjuret
Teh lazy swede
 
Soetdjuret's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Svea
Posts: 1,982
Default Re: Crysis Warhead DX9 VS DX10

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrixteH View Post
+1

I can neither understand the fuss of such a badly optimised game. If i wanted to stare at palm trees and water all day i would have a pic of the maldives on my desktop.

/puts on flameproof jacket
Its not bad optimized you idiot. Its the way the levels are designed along with its huge amount of demanding technologies. You can't even compare it to the half-life or cod games or the bioshock and GoW type of games. There is a good reason for why the game is demanding.

If i wan't to stare at palmleaves all day i'd just run crysis...



Soetdjuret is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-08, 01:38 PM   #23
evox
:3
 
evox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: India
Posts: 2,254
Default Re: Crysis Warhead DX9 VS DX10

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tr1cK View Post
I can't wait til people quit making a fuss over this ****ty engine.
****ty engine? Are you kidding? CE2 is a brilliant accomplishment in terms of both technology and graphics. So it doesn't give 75FPS in DirectX10, big deal. Crysis's performance is pretty good considering the insanely detailed graphics it churns out. Kudos to Crytek for pushing the graphics of this generation, atleast they aren't sitting around twiddling their thumbs like Epic/Ubisoft.
evox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-08, 06:17 PM   #24
gerardfraser
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 237
Default Re: Crysis Warhead DX9 VS DX10

New drivers closing the gap some.180.43

Updated drivers and checked out my 9800GTX+ cards,I love my 9800GTX+ cards.
They are as fast if not faster then 280GTX in SLI with no AA I must add.


DX9 1920x1200



MIN=24.49
AVG=58.81
MAX=83.97


DX10 1920x1200



MIN=0 whats up with that lol
AVG=52.04
MAX=76.43
gerardfraser is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Crysis 3 preview News Gaming Headlines 0 06-16-12 08:20 AM
Crysis 3 E3 trailer features Psycho, Prophet, slow-mo nano bow News Archived News Items 0 06-05-12 08:00 AM
Now Available - Crysis 2 Maximum Edition News Archived News Items 0 05-29-12 06:30 PM
Stressing out GPUs with a DX9 game; is the Witcher 2 the new Crysis? News Archived News Items 0 05-09-12 05:40 PM
ATI R300 & nVidia NV30 - Different visions Uttar Rumor Mill 6 09-06-02 12:19 PM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2014, nV News.