|
|
#25 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
R.I.P. Babe Thread
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 12,387
|
This Thread delivers.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Quote:
![]() Then this should be in the P/R thread. Two things:
Mods/Admins could this please be moved to the proper forum? |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Larnaca, Cyprus
Posts: 4,152
|
Oh look, I have the IQ of a potato...
![]()
__________________
Fafnir: Intel Core 2 Quad 6600@3.2Ghz|eVGA 780i SLI|PNY GTX480 |Kingston DDR667 4096MB|WD Black Caviar 500GB|Seagate SATA 250GB|Seagate SATA 200GB| Seagate SATA 160GB|OptiArc AD-7173S DVDRW|Nec 3351 DVDRW|Creative X-FI XM|LG Flatron W2261V|Logitech X-530|Thermaltake Armor|Amptac 850W SLI PSU|Logitech G9 Mouse|Xigmatek HDT S-1283 CPU Cooler|Windows 7/FW 257.21 PS2 - Wii - Xbox - Xbox360 - PSP - GC - PS3 Owner Boycott Starforce... Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Thanks. 3337, please keep all hardware discussions in the hardware forum(s).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
I'm Geralt
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Chicagoland, once a year in Poland
Posts: 24,364
|
wouldn't be better if he kept them on other forum all together?
__________________
Windows 8 the next big failure, right after Windows ME |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rochester, MN
Posts: 4,018
|
I believe it. Kev is back as liberty something or other.
![]() Plus I'm not willing to believe that he had the foresight to create an account years ago just to come back to after he got banned multiple times. That's giving him waaaaay too much credit. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,510
|
C'mon lads, if i had feckall money to upgrade to current gen hardware i would argue that my 486DX2 is well upto the standards of todays computers.
Ok maybe i wouldn't. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 199
|
Quote:
Weathers and the superior AGP , but I chose AGP because it is clearly Old School superior. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
LOL
This guy is funnier than Bigman. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,510
|
Your obviously just a casual DIY computer builder...not an enthusiast. An enthusiast would take PCI-E 1.0 or 2.0 any time over a AGP motherboard. Hardware manufacturers dont build components to go backwards, they look at creating new hardware that is relevant to todays and future components such as graphic cards. AGP is no longer mainstream, it is obsolete. The reason they create 'newish' components to fit 'older' hardware is a little thing called money. They realise that not everyone is an enthusiast and as a result milk the old cow so to speak.
You talk about graphic card manufacturers creating the equivelant of a gtx 260/280 on AGP....well ok even if they do it wont be before there are newer maybe PCI-E 3.0 graphic cards that are double the power of the GTX 260/280. Sorry dude but you are so LAST GEN. ![]() You hit the nail on the head when you said old school. A PS2 is backwards compatible to PS1 game but a PS3 isnt (correct me if im wrong)....does that make the PS2 better than the PS3? absolutley not. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| nvidia drivers in a motherboard with AGP 1.0 (motherboard MVP3+) | knocker | NVIDIA Linux | 1 | 08-19-02 01:57 AM |