Go Back   nV News Forums > Hardware Forums > Benchmarking And Overclocking

Newegg Daily Deals

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-06-08, 11:57 AM   #25
ViN86
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,486
Default Re: 16000 on 3D Mark 2005 via AGP proves that there was never a need for PCI-E 1.0

Quote:
Originally Posted by nekrosoft13 View Post
Kevpla is that? There can't be that many stupid people in the world.
believe it or not, it's not kevpla
ViN86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-08, 12:30 PM   #26
SLippe
R.I.P. Babe Thread
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 12,387
Default Re: 16000 on 3D Mark 2005 via AGP proves that there was never a need for PCI-E 1.0

This Thread delivers.

SLippe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-08, 12:36 PM   #27
DiscipleDOC
 
DiscipleDOC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Alabama, Planet Earth
Posts: 5,993
Default Re: 16000 on 3D Mark 2005 via AGP proves that there was never a need for PCI-E 1.0

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3777 View Post
Open forum is supposed to be open to all subjects. This is not a benchmark thread, this thread reveals the conspiracy and unnecessaryness of PCI-E.
So in other words, you think there is a conspiracy with hardware?

Then this should be in the P/R thread.

Two things:
  1. "unnecessaryness" is not a word.
  2. This is hardware related. There is a proper forum for this.


Mods/Admins could this please be moved to the proper forum?
DiscipleDOC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-08, 12:37 PM   #28
Lfctony
Registered User
 
Lfctony's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Larnaca, Cyprus
Posts: 4,152
Default Re: 16000 on 3D Mark 2005 via AGP proves that there was never a need for PCI-E 1.0

Oh look, I have the IQ of a potato...
__________________
Fafnir: Intel Core 2 Quad 6600@3.2Ghz|eVGA 780i SLI|PNY GTX480 |Kingston DDR667 4096MB|WD Black Caviar 500GB|Seagate SATA 250GB|Seagate SATA 200GB| Seagate SATA 160GB|OptiArc AD-7173S DVDRW|Nec 3351 DVDRW|Creative X-FI XM|LG Flatron W2261V|Logitech X-530|Thermaltake Armor|Amptac 850W SLI PSU|Logitech G9 Mouse|Xigmatek HDT S-1283 CPU Cooler|Windows 7/FW 257.21

PS2 - Wii - Xbox - Xbox360 - PSP - GC - PS3 Owner

Boycott Starforce...

Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes?
Lfctony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-08, 12:41 PM   #29
DiscipleDOC
 
DiscipleDOC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Alabama, Planet Earth
Posts: 5,993
Default Re: 16000 on 3D Mark 2005 via AGP proves that there was never a need for PCI-E 1.0

Thanks. 3337, please keep all hardware discussions in the hardware forum(s).
DiscipleDOC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-08, 01:13 PM   #30
Bearclaw
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 16000 on 3D Mark 2005 via AGP proves that there was never a need for PCI-E 1.0

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lfctony View Post
Oh look, I have the IQ of a potato...


I wonder if he is geftargnabl's cousin...
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-08, 01:37 PM   #31
nekrosoft13
I'm Geralt
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Chicagoland, once a year in Poland
Posts: 24,366
Default Re: 16000 on 3D Mark 2005 via AGP proves that there was never a need for PCI-E 1.0

Quote:
Originally Posted by DiscipleDOC View Post
Thanks. 3337, please keep all hardware discussions in the hardware forum(s).
wouldn't be better if he kept them on other forum all together?
__________________
Windows 8 the next big failure, right after Windows ME
nekrosoft13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-08, 01:45 PM   #32
nemecb
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rochester, MN
Posts: 4,018
Default Re: 16000 on 3D Mark 2005 via AGP proves that there was never a need for PCI-E 1.0

Quote:
Originally Posted by ViN86 View Post
believe it or not, it's not kevpla
I believe it. Kev is back as liberty something or other.

Plus I'm not willing to believe that he had the foresight to create an account years ago just to come back to after he got banned multiple times. That's giving him waaaaay too much credit.
nemecb is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 10-06-08, 03:33 PM   #33
Logical
Registered User
 
Logical's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,523
Default Re: 16000 on 3D Mark 2005 via AGP proves that there was never a need for PCI-E 1.0

C'mon lads, if i had feckall money to upgrade to current gen hardware i would argue that my 486DX2 is well upto the standards of todays computers.




Ok maybe i wouldn't.
Logical is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-08, 04:28 PM   #34
3777
Registered User
 
3777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 199
Default Re: 16000 on 3D Mark 2005 via AGP proves that there was never a need for PCI-E 1.0

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrixteH View Post
C'mon lads, if i had feckall money to upgrade to current gen hardware i would argue that my 486DX2 is well upto the standards of todays computers.




Ok maybe i wouldn't.
Another MYTH, look at my components and you will see that I had the money to downgrade, but I CHOSE to remain loyal to AGP instead. Ill go so far as to say I could have gotten a PCI-E motherboard and higher end PCI-E ATI or Nvidia video card along with with Core 2 Duo (French) E7200 for the same price as Carl AS Rock Weathers and the superior AGP , but I chose AGP because it is clearly Old School superior.
3777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-08, 04:53 PM   #35
crainger
 
crainger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW, Australia
Posts: 29,559
Send a message via AIM to crainger
Default Re: 16000 on 3D Mark 2005 via AGP proves that there was never a need for PCI-E 1.0

LOL

This guy is funnier than Bigman.
crainger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-08, 05:01 PM   #36
Logical
Registered User
 
Logical's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,523
Default Re: 16000 on 3D Mark 2005 via AGP proves that there was never a need for PCI-E 1.0

Your obviously just a casual DIY computer builder...not an enthusiast. An enthusiast would take PCI-E 1.0 or 2.0 any time over a AGP motherboard. Hardware manufacturers dont build components to go backwards, they look at creating new hardware that is relevant to todays and future components such as graphic cards. AGP is no longer mainstream, it is obsolete. The reason they create 'newish' components to fit 'older' hardware is a little thing called money. They realise that not everyone is an enthusiast and as a result milk the old cow so to speak.

You talk about graphic card manufacturers creating the equivelant of a gtx 260/280 on AGP....well ok even if they do it wont be before there are newer maybe PCI-E 3.0 graphic cards that are double the power of the GTX 260/280. Sorry dude but you are so LAST GEN.

You hit the nail on the head when you said old school. A PS2 is backwards compatible to PS1 game but a PS3 isnt (correct me if im wrong)....does that make the PS2 better than the PS3? absolutley not.
Logical is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
nvidia drivers in a motherboard with AGP 1.0 (motherboard MVP3+) knocker NVIDIA Linux 1 08-19-02 01:57 AM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2014, nV News.