|
|
#1 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 21
|
I recently upgraded from a 8800GTX to a 4870 X2. I expected a bigger jump in my 3DMark06 score than I received. I went from 11861 with the 8800GTX to just 13275 with the 4870X2. One notable difference is that my Nvidia card allowed me to keep the benchmark at 1:1 scaling ratio, so it played at its native 4:3 resolution, whereas my ATI card won't let me do that (I know it's supposed to, but it won't), so the test stretches to fill my screen. I'm assuming those extra pixels on the left and right sides of my screen are bringing my score down. But is something else going on as well? I think most people with my specs (and nothing overclocked) are getting scores of 15,000 - 17,000. Any advice appreciated. Specs below.
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 ASUS P5W64 WS Professional 2 GB (2 x 1024MB) Corsair Dominator XMS2 1066 MHz PC2-8500 CAS5 5-5-5-15 EPP Asus Radeon 4870 X2 Aegia PhysX physics accelerator Creative Sound Blaster® X-Fi Fatal1ty FPS SilverStone 1000W OP1000 (single rail) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 21
|
Let me add this: running the test at 1920 x 1200, 4xAA, 8xAF, my score went from 7523 to 12,443. Perhaps that is an acceptable increase?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,726
|
I really wouldn't put much faith into 3dmark06 tests. It just doesn't always work out to compare between setups because 3dmark doesn't always grab the correct information. Your stock test looks fine as it is going to be totally CPU limited. The higher res test shows some good scaling, but I can bet your still CPU limited in that test too.
For what it's worth, I just did a check in the orb for a C2Q running at 2400mhz and using an ATI 4870X2 and there is only one result which comes in at 12288, so it looks like you're doing okay. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
"TOON ARMY!"
|
Agreed you should very easily hit 3GHz and notice a bigger jump.
__________________
"Never interupt your enemy when he is making a mistake." Processor: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T Black Edition @ 4.25GHz Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 Graphics: ASUS ENGTX470 Memory: 4GB Kingston HyperX Blu PC12800 DDR3 Monitor: LG E2260V-PN Full HD WLED 22" & DELL 20" 2005FPW, Power: Coolermaster Silent Pro Modular 850w PSU Sound: Logitech Z5500 Digital. Cooling: Thermalright Silver Arrow. 1st Storage: Kingston V100 SSDNow128GB SSD 2nd Storage: Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
The Man With Brisk
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,673
|
cpu is holding you back... even at 3.6GHZ my quad core is holding me back in 3dmark06 at default settings... give vantage a try instead
__________________
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 G0 @ 3.6GHZ Asus P5B Deluxe 4GB OCZ Platinum PC8000 EL BFG GTX 280 OC2 1GB @ 729/1512/2538 Dell 2405FPW 24" 3DMark: Vantage - P15397 | 06 - 18734 |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Like others said, try a newer benchmark for more meaningful results. -OR- Play some games and just enjoy your powerful card. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toronto-CAN, Hamburg-DE, Prague-CZ
Posts: 1,893
|
Quote:
![]() You will get higher scores with with higher clocked CPU as others already pointed out. Here is my lousy score as good example. ![]()
__________________
Stop The Meter On Your Internet Use ------------------------------------------------------------ Core i7 980X EE @ 4316 MHz 1.35V - Corsair Hydro Series H50 ASUS Rampage II Extreme - Corsair Dominator 1600MHz 12GB Triple-Channel Sapphire HD 6990 - ATI TV Wonder 650 PCIe Intel X25-M 160GB 34nm G2 SSD - Seagate Barracuda 1TB 32mb Cosmos S Case - Corsair HX1000W PSU Pioner Blu-ray Burner 6X BD-R - Westinghouse LVM-37w3, 37inch 1080p Logitech G25 Racing Wheel - Logitech Cordless RumblePad 2 Sennheiser RS 180 - Windows 7 64-bit Pro |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Single Male
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,115
|
vista or XP? If vista its your ram. Not to mention your slow CPU set it at 3.4GHz and get some decent ram. Drop the clocks at least and set the timings tighter! Drop the CPU multi as well to increase the bandwidth to make up for the lack of ram.
__________________
---Q6600 @3.45 430FSB - P5K Deluxe--- ---1066 5-4-4-12 PL6! - 257 GTX OCed--- ---ASUS Xonar DX - Dell 2407 24 LCD--- |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GPU memory consumption, back buffer, Quadro | tdsussman | NVIDIA Linux | 5 | 08-14-12 09:14 PM |
| [Regression] "6 little screens" problem is back with 302.07 (AU0-8428 pannel) | mile-igad | NVIDIA Linux | 6 | 06-26-12 08:10 AM |
| New DLC Available: Jagged Alliance - Back in Action: Point Blank DLC | News | Gaming Headlines | 0 | 06-13-12 06:30 PM |
| PSN Dusts Self Off, Gets Back Online | News | Gaming Headlines | 0 | 06-10-12 02:30 AM |
| What's holding me back. | Switch | CPUs, Motherboards And Memory | 10 | 09-16-02 09:52 PM |