|
|
#13 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
AKA seekermeister
Join Date: May 2005
Location: At home
Posts: 1,442
|
I made a small separate partiton dedicated for the pagefile, that way I don't have to bother with switching it for defrag, and being separate it causes the main partition to be less fragmented also. I just wish that I could do the same with the hibernation file.
__________________
Rig 1: HAF 922, X2 4400+, Asus A8N32-SLI Deluxe , 4x1GB DDR400, 2x500GB, 1x80GB & 1x250GB + ESATCASE2 w/2x1TB HDs, LG CH10LS20 & GH22LS50, Samsung SH-S202N, Asus Xonar D2X,Creative 5.1, GTX460 SC, FusionHDTV7 Gold RT, Acer X233H, Arris TM520G, Cisco E3000, Scythe Kama, CM RS600 PS,HP 5510v,APC BX1000, XP x64, W7 & Kubuntu 9.10 Rig 2: Antec SX1040BII, A8N-SLI, 2x1GB DDR400, 8800GTS, 1x500GB & 1x1TB HDs, Liteon LH-20AIL and Pioneer DVR-111, Audigy 2 ZS, Creative T20 2.1, Antec 500SP, W7 x64 & XP MCE |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Putting it in a separate partition on the same drive does another except make it harder to defragement. Best option is to put it on a separate physical drive.
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,726
|
When you think about it, you really do want the page file mixed in with the rest of your data. Every time the drive needs to access something from the page file it will have to travel the entire distance across the hard drive.
If I took a 500GB hard drive, then partitioned 450GB of it for OS / data, and then took the remaining for my swap file that would cause your drive to look like this. OS/Data < Lots of free space > swap file. If I only had 100GB of data on that drive, anytime the computer needed to access that swap file it would be skipping over 350GB of dead space, or about 70% of the drive just to read or write from the swap file. On top of that, a drive starts on the outermost edge of the platter, and works its way in. The fastest part of the disk is on the outside. This means the swap file will likely be located on the slowest part of the disk. You can actually hinder performance more than help it using this type of setup. If the swap file is mixed in with your data, it will not only have better read / write speeds, the seek time will go way down because it will be located a lot closer on the disk. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
That's a nice theory BMan but it doesn't work like that. :
: |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
-========-
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Smallville
Posts: 492
|
I used to shut it off. Restart PC. Delete pagefile. Defrag. Turn Pagefile back on after defrag.
Now I have 4gb of memory I just leave it off in Vista 64. Haven't had a problem yet.
__________________
♪♫♪♫ ASUS P6T | I7 920 @ 3.6GHZ | 6GB OCZ PC3-12800 | EVGA GTX570 | CORSAIR CMPSU-850TX 850W |Antec 900 ♪♫♪♫ |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Moving to new home
|
I have the page file on a WD Raptor 36G and a little pagefile on my OS disk of about 250Mgs fixed for BSODs debugging.
__________________
Intel Quad Core Q6600 @ 3,4 | 4Gigs (2x2) OCZ Reaper PC-8500 | Gigabyte P35-DS3R | Western Digital 500G Caviar SE16 SATA2 NCQ | Seagate160 Gig 7200.9 SATA NCQ | Maxtor 300Gig SATA NCQ | Asus Geforce 260GTX | Samsung Syncmaster 930BF 19'' | BeQuiet Straight Power 700W | Cooler Master CM690 |Windows Vista x64 SP2 |Windows XP SP3 [Deceased PSU, no money for new one, stucked with laptop and XBOX 360] Macbook Pro 13': 4gigs | Core2 Duo 2,53Mhz | 250Gigs HDD |geforce 9400M| aluminium unibody | Mac OS X 10.6.2 Snow Leopard |gentoo Linux 2.631 kernel Wolfhound´s Brute: http://wolfhound77.mybrute.com |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|