|
|
#1 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,486
|
ive been lookin for a new 1080p HDTV to replace my aging 720p TV. id like a 120Hz LCD with a good contrast ratio and a price under $1500.
i have found this little beauty: http://www.amazon.com/Sony-Bravia-KD.../dp/B0019GTRM6 has a lot of features and has good reviews (it's actually pretty much an XBR minus 2 or 3 features, see bottom of link). just wondering if anyone here has one or any other thoughts you guys may have. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
My friend has one and it looks amazing, but I honestly thought my Panny looked better (we were playing PS3). I know my TV lacks alot of the features but I doubt I will ever notice the lack of them.
The blacks on his set were good but not nearly as dark as I like them but the color vibrancy was just as good. One thing his TV did better was SD resolutions... PS2 and standard TV were better... |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,486
|
so, what should i really be looking for?
is the best picture a combination of contrast ratio, resolution, and refresh rate? or other things? i really want to get the best bang for my buck and i want 1080p and HDMI. also, the screen absolutely CANNOT have input lag. i will be very upset if any of my games (ie Guitar Hero) lag on the screen. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Any decent TV will not have ghosting or input lag. Heck, My sisters old DLP down stairs has none and its over 3 years old now.
I don't know how important refresh rate is when it comes to TVs for normal viewing and gaming, I can only expect it being important for PC hookup and possibly highend Blu-Ray viewing. Contrast Ratio, Resolution and Black Levels are the most important, look up reviews prior to purchase to make sure the numbers aren't inflated to rediculous numbers. This is the TV I have and I am extremely satisfied with it. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16889187081 |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,486
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
xeroyphyte
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,271
|
like i told you when i talked to you. 120/24p is supposedly 24 frames per second. At 120hz, it's the same exact screen 5 times, whereas in 60hz something refered to as 2:3 pulldown occurs. While I have a tv that supports 120hz, and a BD players outputting 24p, I honestly don't see that much of a difference. In fact I usually leave the 120hz off when watching cable or playing a game. Of course I have a LCoS display, so I don't have to worry about motion blur (response time is around 16 microseconds, as opposed to 2-8 milliseconds). I also have a few friends with panny plasmas that also never use it. When you think about it, most games are struggling to hit 720/60p (iirc the only one that actually acheives this is GT5). Like you said though, LCDs can be sensitive to input lag, just make sure you thoroughly research you set (go to store and hook up your 360). ![]()
__________________
HT: 360 -- Sony60A3000 -- Onkyo SR605 --> Polk cs2, monitor 60s and monitor 40s w/ Bic F12 sub -- PS3 XBL:Mr X3r0 -- PSN:Mr_X3r0 Rig- Asus P6X58D Premium - intel i7 920 @3.6 - EVGA GTX570 - Corsair HX1000 - Prolimatech Mega Shadow - WD640 - COOLER MASTER ATCS 840 - OCZ Gold 6GB DDR3 1600* |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,486
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 6,365
|
Quote:
. Mine runs at 60hz and I don't notice any flickering at all. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,011
|
It puts out a ton of heat to, good in the winter.
__________________
• EVGA GeForce GTX 680 • PCP&C 750 Quad • ASUS 12x BD-ROM • DELL U2412M E-IPS • Windows 7 Pro x64 SP1 • Logitech Z5500 5.1 • |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|