|
|
#25 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Munich
Posts: 910
|
Hi!
Just for the sake of completeness, here's a summary of Modelines for the most commonly used display resolutions for TripleHead2Go: Dual Head Modes Code:
2x 1680x1050: ModeLine "3360x1050" 238.00 3360 3424 3488 3680 1050 1053 1061 1080 +HSync +VSync 2x 1600x1200: ModeLine "3200x1200" 281.40 3200 3264 3456 3752 1200 1201 1206 1250 +HSync +VSync 2x 1920x1080: ModeLine "3840x1080" 277.00 3840 3904 3968 4160 1080 1083 1092 1111 +HSync +VSync 2x 1920x1200: ModeLine "3840x1200" 308.00 3840 3904 3968 4160 1200 1203 1213 1235 +HSync +VSync Code:
3x 1280x1024: ModeLine "3840x1024" 254.31 3840 3856 3872 3976 1024 1025 1032 1066 +HSync +VSync 3x 1360x768: ModeLine "4080x768" 200.38 4080 4104 4136 4200 768 771 779 795 +HSync +VSync 3x 1440x900: ModeLine "4320x900" 320.10 4320 4400 4688 5712 900 903 915 934 +HSync +VSync 3x 1680x1050: ModeLine "5040x1050" 326.66 5040 5104 5168 5376 1050 1053 1057 1066 +HSync +VSync even higher resolutions (as discussed earlier in this thread), i.e. you could have a 4x 1920x1200@60Hz quad head setup by connecting two LCD to the first DVI-D output of a video card via one TH2G and two more LCDs to the second DVI-D output via another TH2G. Don't forget to use the options "UseEDID" "False", "ExactModeTimingsDVI" "True" and to provide "HorizSync"/"VertRefresh" as shown in the sample xorg.conf files above. Please note that resolutions exceeding 8192 pixel (i.e. 6x 1680x1050 = 10080x1050) require a recent Quadro card (however, because of lack of material, i couldn't tried that out, yet). However, please note that Matrox neither officially supports Linux for TH2G nor two TH2Gs connected to the same PC at the same time. Also, for some LCDs, it is necessary to tweak the modelines for proper operation (please check posting #24 in this thread). So i certainly can't guarantee that such setups will work for you! regards Bernhard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Munich
Posts: 910
|
Hi!
Just to keep those curious in the loop: i finally got my monitor stands (self-build by my brother for 60 Euros material cost) and since Acer was unable to repair the dead on arrival LCD within four weeks, i decided to purchase a new one. So here's the result: Working on six displays is awesome, but i can't fully recommend it for gaming: at least for ut2004 at full screen the crosshair would be "between" two LCDs which is pretty unplayable. Since there is no way to displace the crosshair you can only "displace" the screen in order to get the crosshair into a playable position. For x-plane, the bar in middle is less of a problem and with six displays you can now read the instruments much better. Attached are some pics of my 5040x2100 single video card dual TH2G setup regards Bernhard Last edited by JaXXoN; 03-06-09 at 12:56 PM. Reason: typo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 10
|
Hey, I'm actually trying to get 5040x1050 working with those exact monitors only through WINDOWS... it doesnt want to work.
I'm wondering if you managed to get it working by creating a custom resolution with unique timing settings or something? Any ideas? |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Munich
Posts: 910
|
Quote:
As mentioned in posting #22 in this thread, for me the symptom was that the Acer displays only recognized 1680x1024 (check with on-screen-display) so that the lower 26 lines have been missing and the 1024 visible lines have been stretched to the 1050 native lines of the LCD, causing ugly moire patterns. The situation was the same, on Linux and with Windows when using the default timings. Especially for windows, the taskbar was not within the visible range - very annoying! Is this what you are observing, too? If true, then you may give the Nvidia control panel on windows a try to adjust the vertical blanking time. For details on how to get to the timings setting dialog, please follow the instruction in this posting: http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/show...10&postcount=6 I used this to retrieve the timing information on Windows so that i could create the appropriate modelines for Linux (however, not fully functional on Linux until increasing the vertical blanking time). If i remember correctly, there have been up/down buttons so that you could indeed modify the values (but i didn't tried that out). What i needed to do to get my Acer LCD working was to change the vertical blanking timing from 1066 to 1073. Additionally, i increased the pixel clock from 326.66MHz to 328.80MHz in order to compensate the frame rate reduction caused by increasing the vertical timing (at least, there should be 57Hz, right?). The hard drive with the Windows installation is somewhere in a drawer right now and it would take me some time to setup everything, again. So can you please try that out and report the results? regards Bernhard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 10
|
Thanks for your help so far... I think our problems slightly differ. My monitors recognize 1680x1050 at least when set on single mode, without using the TH2GO. They work fine... ect but that's at 60hz. When i go to setup 5040x1050 via the TripleHead2go... it requires 57hz... this is some constraint of the actual TH2go unit. I'm pretty sure my monitors don't like the 57 hz... My nVidia control panel is slightly different (i believe) from the one explained in that post you sent me to... but I am able to go and create custom resolutions and even mess with advanced specs like timings ect. At one point 5040x1050 was included in this custom resolution screen, i'm not sure how to get it back. (I had to remove the drivers at one point because the Matrox Software attempted to put my monitors in 5040x1050 display mode and the monitors would just read "Signal Not Supported" no matter what i did) so now that setting is gone, i could just as easily create a custom resolution similar to how you did with modeline, and use the Matrox again... I'm just not sure exactly what to use for settings.
I've included a screenshot of the resolution and timing settings (on a single display of 1680x1050) bare in mind this has 60hz and works fine. But maybe you could give me some hints on how to use this screen to create a working custom resolution with 57hz, for 5040x1050 since you seem to be an expert on these things |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | ||||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Munich
Posts: 910
|
Quote:
to the video card :-) Quote:
BTW.: when i had the problem with my displays, i contacted Acer support. The official statement from them was that "the native resolution of this Acer display is 1680x1050 at 60Hz". One could imply that 57Hz are not supported. however, EDID reports 56-76Hz, so it *should* work. Quote:
1.) Installed WindowsXP (a version including SP2) 2). Installed the Nvidia driver (181.20_geforce_winxp_32bit_international_whql.exe ) 3.) Installed the latest Matrox GXM tools (vxp2k_gxm_2_04_00_011_whql.exe) 4.) Executed the GXM Wizard and selected the 5040x1050 mode. This brought me to the 5040x1050 setup where the 26 lines where missing. Can you please re-installing the driver and the matrox tool to reproduce this result? From there, it should be possible to adjust the vertical timing setting. Quote:
Please let me know if you strictly can't get it working, then i will look into it. regards Bernhard |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 10
|
Im not sure our problems are the same... I am unable to get any display when i create a 5040x1050 view... it just starts saying signal not supported
and since the Matrox Software, doesn't give a 15 second trial period like windows does, then im stuck with no vision, until i reboot in safe mode, remove the nvidia drivers and start over. It's a hell cycle. PS im using Vista x64 Im going to try to get a screen shot of the 5040x1050 resolution. Thanks and stay tuned., |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Munich
Posts: 910
|
Quote:
above basically works. Quote:
That may make a difference - i only tried it on XP. Maybe the Matrox configuration software comes with a different default timing than the XP variant? I suggest borrowing some displays that work fine with the TH2G. You can then hopefully make the timing adjustment with the nvidia control panel and switch to your displays when finished. Not quite a perfect solution, because in case Windows looses its display information for some reason then you have to repeat this procedure. I guess a single display would be sufficient for this testing, but then you would always need to figure out on which output a certain application windows is currently displayed on (reconnecting the LCD to that output on the TH2G). BTW.: In case the displays are brand new, then you may try to ask the dealer to take them back because they are not working as expected ... Unfortunately, Matrox doesn't provide a compatibility list which displays are working fine. There are obviously 1680x1050 displays that just work OOTB with the default timing (i.e. please check xianthax's post #22 in this thread. My old Benq 2091 are basically also working fine, but have a 1600x1200 native resolution). regards Bernhard |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 10
|
If i manage to get the 5040x1050 custom res with the timing settings and get a similar screenshot do you think you might have some advice as to what to try on the various settings?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 10
|
So i managed to get the custom resolution back in there... all i have to do is stop the matrox software before it attempts to put the system into that resolution.
Really all it's doing is creating these custom resolutions... so maybe with your expertise I could tweak this one in a way so that its suitable for these monitors... I've included image. |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Munich
Posts: 910
|
Perfect. It should be sufficient to set the value for "Vertical total" from 1068
to 1073. All other timing values are identical to what i have except the pixel clock: i have 328.80MHz where your setup shows only 273.45MHz - that's pretty low! Even in your current setup, it should be 5376*1068*57 = 327.26MHz! Looks like that there is yet another problem ... regards Bernhard |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 10
|
looks like im screwed... theres no way to edit the pixel clock...
linux > windows as usual I guess it's time for new ... new monitors. Unfortunately i have been preparing for this system for a while so i bought these monitors over 3 months ago, and no longer have the boxes :-( |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Need Help Installing NVIDIA Tesla M2070Q in Linux RHEL5 | Ferianto85 | NVIDIA Linux | 0 | 05-18-12 08:35 PM |
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 brings Kepler on a $399 budget (SlashGear) | News | GeForce GTX 670 Reviews | 0 | 05-10-12 08:40 AM |
| Rumor regarding lack of 680 availability | ViN86 | Rumor Mill | 6 | 05-09-12 04:48 PM |