|
|
#1 | |
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,413
|
I am using a GTX 260 for video and just installed a 9800 GT 1 gb card for PhysX. Got and improvement in Batman.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,044
|
I added the same card for physx a few days ago and it definitely makes for a nice boost in batman and sacred 2. Weird thing is that all games seem smoother now; even mass effect seems to run a bit better.
__________________
i7 920@4.03|asus p6t7ws|6gb ocz|gtx580oc sli|x-fi fatality|x25m+12tb|enermax 1kw|dell u3011 & 2405fpw |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
I was doing that before I went to SLI...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 17,986
|
I was doing that before I went to SLI...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
CUBE
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 18,844
|
I have a 9600GT I use for Physx but I don't have it installed right now since I'm not playing any Physx games at the moment.
When I decide to play Mirror's Edge, Cryostasis and Batman I'll definitely put the 9600GT back in.
__________________
6GB DDR2 @ 942Mhz 5-5-5-20 1.9v (2x1Gb Wintec AMPX PC2-8500 & 2x2Gb G.Skill PC2-6400) - EVGA Geforce GTX 470 @ 750/1500/1850 (1.050v) Sparkle Geforce GTS 250 1Gb Low-Profile (Physx) - Crucial RealSSD C300 64Gb SSD - Seagate 7200.12 500Gb SATA - Seagate 7200.10 320Gb SATA ASUS VW266H 25.5" LCD - OCZ GameXStream 700W PSU - ASUS Xonar DX - Logitech Z-5500 5.1 Surround - Windows 7 Professional x64 ---- HTPC ---- Asus M3A78-EM 780G - AMD Athlon X2 5050e 45W @ 2.6Ghz - 2x2GB Kingston PC2-6400 DDR2 - Sparkle 350W PSU Seagate 7200.10 320Gb SATA - Seagate 7200.10 250Gb SATA - Athenatech A100BB.350 MicroATX Desktop - Creative X-Fi XtremeMusic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 17,986
|
Does it really make that big of a difference?
I'll be rockin' dual 8800GTXs for a while, probably wont have an option to upgrade till sometime next year. I was figurin' on sellin' them off to help pay for whatever card I get next. If PhysX is that nice, I might just keep one for the added effects. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In the clouds!:)
Posts: 1,252
|
see sig. im also running my secondery moniter for hardware monitering on it too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
CUBE
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 18,844
|
Yes.
![]() If you have a graphics intensive game that also uses the GPU for physics, its going to take a lot of processing power to handle both tasks. If you throw in a second graphics card that takes on all of the physics duties, leaving the primary GPU to do all of the graphics work you're going to have much better performance. http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/...ance/page5.asp I should see a 21% increase in average performance, and probably a much more significant increase in minimum framerates when there are a lot of physcs and graphics effects on screen.
__________________
6GB DDR2 @ 942Mhz 5-5-5-20 1.9v (2x1Gb Wintec AMPX PC2-8500 & 2x2Gb G.Skill PC2-6400) - EVGA Geforce GTX 470 @ 750/1500/1850 (1.050v) Sparkle Geforce GTS 250 1Gb Low-Profile (Physx) - Crucial RealSSD C300 64Gb SSD - Seagate 7200.12 500Gb SATA - Seagate 7200.10 320Gb SATA ASUS VW266H 25.5" LCD - OCZ GameXStream 700W PSU - ASUS Xonar DX - Logitech Z-5500 5.1 Surround - Windows 7 Professional x64 ---- HTPC ---- Asus M3A78-EM 780G - AMD Athlon X2 5050e 45W @ 2.6Ghz - 2x2GB Kingston PC2-6400 DDR2 - Sparkle 350W PSU Seagate 7200.10 320Gb SATA - Seagate 7200.10 250Gb SATA - Athenatech A100BB.350 MicroATX Desktop - Creative X-Fi XtremeMusic |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 17,986
|
Hmm... looks like I'm keeping one of these GTXs when I go to get a new card.
![]() Does it matter the PCI-e bandwidth? Like, if I have a physical PCI-e x16 slot, but it's only x4 electrical, will that render the 8800GTX useless for PhysX? |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
CUBE
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 18,844
|
Quote:
Just make sure your PSU and case ventilation is up to the task. The 8800GTX is a fairly power hungry card and isn't as efficient with its clock throttling as newer cards. Its also only PCI-E 1.1 compatible, so the x4 slot will probably effect the performance more. Just curious... what kind of board are you using?
__________________
6GB DDR2 @ 942Mhz 5-5-5-20 1.9v (2x1Gb Wintec AMPX PC2-8500 & 2x2Gb G.Skill PC2-6400) - EVGA Geforce GTX 470 @ 750/1500/1850 (1.050v) Sparkle Geforce GTS 250 1Gb Low-Profile (Physx) - Crucial RealSSD C300 64Gb SSD - Seagate 7200.12 500Gb SATA - Seagate 7200.10 320Gb SATA ASUS VW266H 25.5" LCD - OCZ GameXStream 700W PSU - ASUS Xonar DX - Logitech Z-5500 5.1 Surround - Windows 7 Professional x64 ---- HTPC ---- Asus M3A78-EM 780G - AMD Athlon X2 5050e 45W @ 2.6Ghz - 2x2GB Kingston PC2-6400 DDR2 - Sparkle 350W PSU Seagate 7200.10 320Gb SATA - Seagate 7200.10 250Gb SATA - Athenatech A100BB.350 MicroATX Desktop - Creative X-Fi XtremeMusic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 17,986
|
Quote:
My PSU is a Silverstone 850Watt with four +12v rails. I'm fully aware of what the G80 consumes, I ran dual 640MB GTS for a while, which I bought on launch day back in '06. ![]() I just wasn't certain how well PhsyX performance scaled with the PCI-e bus speeds. Wasn't sure if full speed was necessary, or if an x4 slot would suffice. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|