Go Back   nV News Forums > Graphics Card Forums > NVIDIA GeForce 200 Series

Newegg Daily Deals

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-17-09, 07:50 PM   #1
xorbe
Unbuffered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 388
Default GT240

TomsHardware benchmarks 512MB and 1GB versions, but inevitably, they are GDDR5 models, and 95% of Newegg stock is the much slower GDDR3 models ...

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...-240,2475.html

Any GT240 512MB GDDR3 vs GDDR5 benchmarks on the web?
xorbe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-09, 11:30 PM   #2
CaptNKILL
CUBE
 
CaptNKILL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 18,844
Default Re: GT240

That's pretty solid performance for a card that doesn't require a power connector.

Still, the price will determine how good of a deal this is. Its already slower than the 9800\8800GT and even the 9600GT.
__________________
---- Primary Rig ---- CoolerMaster 690 II Advance - Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3P - Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.0Ghz + Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme
6GB DDR2 @ 942Mhz 5-5-5-20 1.9v (2x1Gb Wintec AMPX PC2-8500 & 2x2Gb G.Skill PC2-6400) - EVGA Geforce GTX 470 @ 750/1500/1850 (1.050v)
Sparkle Geforce GTS 250 1Gb Low-Profile (Physx) - Crucial RealSSD C300 64Gb SSD - Seagate 7200.12 500Gb SATA - Seagate 7200.10 320Gb SATA
ASUS VW266H 25.5" LCD - OCZ GameXStream 700W PSU - ASUS Xonar DX - Logitech Z-5500 5.1 Surround - Windows 7 Professional x64
---- HTPC ---- Asus M3A78-EM 780G - AMD Athlon X2 5050e 45W @ 2.6Ghz - 2x2GB Kingston PC2-6400 DDR2 - Sparkle 350W PSU
Seagate 7200.10 320Gb SATA - Seagate 7200.10 250Gb SATA - Athenatech A100BB.350 MicroATX Desktop - Creative X-Fi XtremeMusic
CaptNKILL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-09, 12:54 AM   #3
Rakeesh
 
Rakeesh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Sonoran Desert
Posts: 6,865
Default Re: GT240

This thing looks like it would run really cool, if it were a little faster I'd take it. I'm sick of these graphics cards that run as hot as a space heater.
Rakeesh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-09, 10:46 AM   #4
DSC
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 888
Default Re: GT240

Only buy the GT 240 GDDR5 versions, 512MB or 1GB. Don't bother with the GDDR3 versions, they are crippled by lack of bandwidth, 28-32GB vs 54.4GB on the GDDR5 version.

It's also good for HTPC, it has PureVideo HD VP4 with full bitstream decoding for H.264, VC-1, MPEG-2 & MPEG4 ASP and HD audio processor built-in for 8 channel LPCM support like the GT 220 and 210.
DSC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-09, 10:57 AM   #5
HYBRID
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 495
Default Re: GT240

I don’t really get the purpose of these cards other than maybe HTPC, or maybe using it as a discrete PhysX card.

It’s certainly to slow for gaming at anything higher than 1024 or 1280, and the price is to close to a 9800gt which you can find all day long for $89 bucks new and will play better oh well.
__________________
[Asus Extreme Rampage III| Asus GTX580 Matrix |Intel I7 950 @ 4.011GHZ vcore 1.275| Corsair H80 Liquid Cooler| Intel SSD 80GB & 1 150 GIG Raptor|Corsair Dominator GT CMG6GX3M3A1600C7 | Asus Essence STX|Plextor PX-880SA|Asus BluRay Drive |Cosair HX-850HX| Corsair Obsidian 800D ||Win 7 RTM 64-Bit OEM|Samsung T-240 24" 1920X1200 5MS
HYBRID is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-09, 03:37 PM   #6
xorbe
Unbuffered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 388
Default Re: GT240

because I don't want to fight heat and power issues in the abused family desktop. this looks like a decent no-hassle upgrade from the entry-level 7-series card that's in there now.

(yes, I have a gtx260 in my personal machine, a real video card, hehheh.)
xorbe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-09, 03:40 PM   #7
Q
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,808
Default Re: GT240

I've got a GT210 that has a dual slot STOCK cooler on it. No fricken lie. I was highly disappointed to lose a slot in my HTPC.
Q is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-10, 12:31 PM   #8
ViN86
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,486
Default Re: GT240

Hey guys, Mike just put up my review of the GT 240. There was a mention of comparing it with a 9800GT so I compared the two. Check it out

http://www.nvnews.net/reviews/evga_g...gt/index.shtml
ViN86 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 01-01-10, 02:10 PM   #9
CaptNKILL
CUBE
 
CaptNKILL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 18,844
Default Re: GT240

GPU-Z must be reporting some things incorrectly with those cards.

The fillrate of the two cards should be much closer and the bandwidth shouldn't be doubled. The transistor count and die size are also backwards. I'm surprised that GPU-Z has errors like that.

Just using this as a reference:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compari...rce_200_Series

Very nice review though ViN.

That would make a great physx card.
__________________
---- Primary Rig ---- CoolerMaster 690 II Advance - Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3P - Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.0Ghz + Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme
6GB DDR2 @ 942Mhz 5-5-5-20 1.9v (2x1Gb Wintec AMPX PC2-8500 & 2x2Gb G.Skill PC2-6400) - EVGA Geforce GTX 470 @ 750/1500/1850 (1.050v)
Sparkle Geforce GTS 250 1Gb Low-Profile (Physx) - Crucial RealSSD C300 64Gb SSD - Seagate 7200.12 500Gb SATA - Seagate 7200.10 320Gb SATA
ASUS VW266H 25.5" LCD - OCZ GameXStream 700W PSU - ASUS Xonar DX - Logitech Z-5500 5.1 Surround - Windows 7 Professional x64
---- HTPC ---- Asus M3A78-EM 780G - AMD Athlon X2 5050e 45W @ 2.6Ghz - 2x2GB Kingston PC2-6400 DDR2 - Sparkle 350W PSU
Seagate 7200.10 320Gb SATA - Seagate 7200.10 250Gb SATA - Athenatech A100BB.350 MicroATX Desktop - Creative X-Fi XtremeMusic
CaptNKILL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-10, 12:48 AM   #10
ViN86
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,486
Default Re: GT240

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptNKILL View Post
GPU-Z must be reporting some things incorrectly with those cards.

The fillrate of the two cards should be much closer and the bandwidth shouldn't be doubled. The transistor count and die size are also backwards. I'm surprised that GPU-Z has errors like that.

Just using this as a reference:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compari...rce_200_Series

Very nice review though ViN.

That would make a great physx card.
Wow I should have checked out that GPU-Z report. I bet it was just a fluke since it was a new card when I tested it. (I did the GPU-Z report months ago)

I will run it again when I get back to my rig (I am away atm, since I am home for break). I will fix it up. Hope the review helps some people though. It really is a great secondary card. It puts up great performance and the fact that it doesn't need external power is a huge benefit for those that want a dedicated PhysX card without the extra power.
ViN86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2014, nV News.