Go Back   nV News Forums > Hardware Forums > Benchmarking And Overclocking

Newegg Daily Deals

Thread Tools
Old 08-14-10, 10:32 PM   #1
sammy sung
sammy sung's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Stockholm Sweden
Posts: 2,319
Default GT220 as dedicated phys-x card = bad idea..

Had a GT220 laying around and wanted to test it as a phys-x card and it was a lot worse than i expected.This apparently has 48 stream processors so it's above Nvidias minumum value as i understand it.


GTX 470 gfx+phys-x

GTX 470 gfx/GT220 phys-x

Crap performance and clearly unusable as a dedicated card for phys-x.Makes me wonder what kind of card it would take to improve the 470's abilities ,anyone has a clue ?
-=[Q9650@3.6GHZ | Thermalright ultra 120 extreme | Antec 1200 |ASUS P5Q-PREMIUM|MSI N580GTX Twin Frozr II| Kingston Hyper X DDR2 1066 4GB]=-
sammy sung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-10, 12:05 AM   #2
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,103
Default Re: GT220 as dedicated phys-x card = bad idea..

You have to understand how fluidmark works. It's not GPU intense at all at rendering the scene, just calculating the physx. So it's only natural that a 470 gets higher performance than a lowly GT 220. Try async mode this will put more stress on the GPU doing the graphics rendering because it will render graphics as fast as it can (higher GPU usage) and the physx framerate will be separate. Also try setting the number of particles to be lower, very few applications use 60,000. I believe the old version used 20,000 or so. Most physx titles use less than 10,000.

This is also proof that a better processor will help out just as much as a high end nvidia card. My GT 240 gets nearly 40 fps in that benchmark with a stock core i7 930 but you get 30 fps with an overclocked Q9650 and a 470 which is around what I got when I had a Core 2 Quad. So your processor is probably limiting how much the 470 can be utilized for physx (check your GPU usage in GPU-Z or another program). Physx seems to really like Core i7 for some reason. I'm not sure why exactly, I know they are good processors but it seems like they aren't THAT much better.

The best test is to try some actual games that use physx like Mirror's Edge and Arkham Asylum (for mirror's edge you will need to overwrite the physx dlls in the game folder with newer ones from the latest physx driver or performance will really suck). The Mafia 2 demo benchmark is also a pretty good test though the framerate will likely suck no matter what you use. But I would be interested if a 470 + 220 performs better than just a 470. I bet it will because Mafia 2 is very graphic intense.
JasonPC is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2014, nV News.