|
|
#1 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 5
|
Hello,
Does anyone know if emailed bug reports are acknowledged in any way? I sent one in 2 or 3 weeks ago and have heard nothing. Are they ignored? Tim |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Uh... For what?
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 5
|
Sorry, I should have clarified.
I run grsecurity and it detected a user land pointer being derefrenced in the kernel. With the option that detects this enabled, I end up with a black screen. Right now I am running without it. I sent in the email since I would like to run with that option, and because of the possible security issue involved in dereferencing that pointer. The problem started in version 256.x |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 5
|
One other thing, I am not saying there is a security issue, but better safe than sorry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Ah, my bad. Sorry man, I'm using my phone right now and didn't notice the Linux sub forum.
or else I wouldn't have asked. Assumed it was an open thread bigman thread or something. ![]() |
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
NVIDIA Corporation
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,487
|
Sorry, I remember seeing that email go by, but was too busy and forgot to reply to it. It sounds like grsecurity is being a little overly zealous about checking for that sort of thing. There are several calls the driver makes into the kernel that include pointers to user data, and I believe they're all carefully checked.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 5
|
I tried replying but didn't see it.
I assume that the user pointer derefs will remain, correct? Thanks Tim |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
NVIDIA Corporation
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,487
|
Yes, unless there's some evidence of an actual security problem.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|