Warhead, Veryhigh + 16xQAA + 2560x1600 - 67fps

Soetdjuret · 09-26-10, 01:16 AM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JktNjrfojsw&hd=1

67fps average. So is this the rig you need to max out crysis and maintain over 60 fps lol? 3 years after it's release? whahahaha

**bob saget** · 09-26-10, 01:37 AM

MONSTER computer. STALKER and HEAVEN benchmarks are so pretty

gerardfraser · 09-26-10, 07:30 PM

What no love for ATI cards.Here a quick vid I did on the snow level in the Video for someone who did not believe my FPS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dB8h68S2uj8

Also I might add my 480GTX are not bad either.

red777star · 11-04-10, 01:28 PM

Crossfire barely works with 2 x HD5870 not to mention quad. It is interesting that he is getting 70FPS in Metro including DOF and Tesse. I had 3 Way Crossfire with HD5870 and whole game run like crap. Same CPU have like a guy in the video.

JasonPC · 11-06-10, 11:24 PM

red777star strikes again

wysiwyg · 11-11-10, 06:51 PM

i thought warhead ran maxed out at 1920x1200 pretty smoothly on my single 480

but 4 is only for the rich

Soetdjuret · 12-19-10, 05:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wysiwyg

i thought warhead ran maxed out at 1920x1200 pretty smoothly on my single 480

but 4 is only for the rich

Maxing out will require you to run 16xQAA in addition to dx10 and enthusiast settings.. and u cant do that on a single 480.

BioHazZarD · 12-20-10, 05:53 AM

wow not cheap to run a 3 year old game..

Soetdjuret · 12-20-10, 11:46 AM

In fact, using 16xQAA is pointless, because it doesn't look better than 8ggr AA. Even using 2x2SSAA makes the game look better than using high levels of AA and on the same time being less demanding.

So a 3 years old game. I¨'d say u can max it out using graphics cards for 360 dollars. When i say maxing out, am talking about Very high, dx10, 1920x1200, and 8xAA.. More is not sufficient.

09-26-10, 01:16 AM	#1
Soetdjuret Teh lazy swede Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Svea Posts: 1,978	Warhead, Veryhigh + 16xQAA + 2560x1600 - 67fps http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JktNjrfojsw&hd=1 67fps average. So is this the rig you need to max out crysis and maintain over 60 fps lol? 3 years after it's release? whahahaha __________________ R.I.P Stage6 \| per haud Justiciá illic exsisto haud pacís...

09-26-10, 01:37 AM	#2
bob saget Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Vancouver, originally Russia Posts: 23,133	Re: Warhead, Veryhigh + 16xQAA + 2560x1600 - 67fps MONSTER computer. STALKER and HEAVEN benchmarks are so pretty

09-26-10, 07:30 PM	#3
gerardfraser Registered User Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 237	Re: Warhead, Veryhigh + 16xQAA + 2560x1600 - 67fps What no love for ATI cards.Here a quick vid I did on the snow level in the Video for someone who did not believe my FPS http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dB8h68S2uj8 Also I might add my 480GTX are not bad either.

11-04-10, 01:28 PM	#4
red777star Registered User Join Date: Oct 2010 Posts: 161	Re: Warhead, Veryhigh + 16xQAA + 2560x1600 - 67fps Crossfire barely works with 2 x HD5870 not to mention quad. It is interesting that he is getting 70FPS in Metro including DOF and Tesse. I had 3 Way Crossfire with HD5870 and whole game run like crap. Same CPU have like a guy in the video.

11-06-10, 11:24 PM	#5
JasonPC Registered User Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 2,103	Re: Warhead, Veryhigh + 16xQAA + 2560x1600 - 67fps red777star strikes again

11-11-10, 06:51 PM	#6
wysiwyg Registered User Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: London, England Posts: 2,987	Re: Warhead, Veryhigh + 16xQAA + 2560x1600 - 67fps i thought warhead ran maxed out at 1920x1200 pretty smoothly on my single 480 but 4 is only for the rich

12-20-10, 05:53 AM	#8
BioHazZarD USCM Marine Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Sweden Posts: 2,369	Re: Warhead, Veryhigh + 16xQAA + 2560x1600 - 67fps wow not cheap to run a 3 year old game.. __________________ Chieftec Miditower /w 5 case fans \| Corsair 620W HX PSU \| Asus M4N98TD EVO SLI \| AMD Athlon2 X2 260 3,2GHz \| Corsair 3GB PC3-10666 \| eVGA Geforce GTX 460 1GB (336shader) \| Samsung Spinpoint x2 250GB HD +SATA 320GB \| SB Audigy 4 @ 2.1 \| Samsung Syncmaster BX2331 TFT 23" running 1920x1080@60hz \| Windows XP PRO SP2 \| \|

12-20-10, 11:46 AM	#9
Soetdjuret Teh lazy swede Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Svea Posts: 1,978	Re: Warhead, Veryhigh + 16xQAA + 2560x1600 - 67fps In fact, using 16xQAA is pointless, because it doesn't look better than 8ggr AA. Even using 2x2SSAA makes the game look better than using high levels of AA and on the same time being less demanding. So a 3 years old game. I¨'d say u can max it out using graphics cards for 360 dollars. When i say maxing out, am talking about Very high, dx10, 1920x1200, and 8xAA.. More is not sufficient. __________________ R.I.P Stage6 \| per haud Justiciá illic exsisto haud pacís...