|
|
#1 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: South Florida
Posts: 524
|
I stepped up from an EVGA GTX 470 to a 580 in my secondary system. However, I have not noticed that much of a performance increase in my games
I'm wondering if it is my slower CPU that could be holding me back. I have a Core i7 920 running at 3.07GHz. I thought this would be more than enough, but it looks like this is not the case. I get P5710 in 3DMark '11 and P28460 in 3DMark Vantage. My games run well, but not as well as I had hoped. I thought the GTX 580 would be WAY faster than a GTX 470. Maybe my expectations were too high?
__________________
Core i7 3770 @ 3.4GHz EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti Superclocked 1TB Seagate HDD 7200 RPM 32MB Cache 16X DVD-RW drive Gateway 24-inch 108p monitor Gateway speakers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Resident Alien
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,776
|
your cpu isnt holding you back. Your expectations are too high.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: South Florida
Posts: 524
|
Thanks. I don't think it was really worth the upgrade. I paid $200 plus shipping both ways which brought the total upgrade to almost $300. I originally paid $299 for the GTX 470, so it's like I paid $600 for the GTX 580! It's still a nice card, but certainly not worth that! I don't think it's even worth $499! Maybe $399 at the most. I hope if I overclock it a bit I'll get better results. I thought the GTX 580 would be at least 40% faster in games, but that is NOT the case for me. Many reviewers seem to use superclocked Core i7 CPUs that I can't match.
__________________
Core i7 3770 @ 3.4GHz EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti Superclocked 1TB Seagate HDD 7200 RPM 32MB Cache 16X DVD-RW drive Gateway 24-inch 108p monitor Gateway speakers |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Resident Alien
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,776
|
It probably is a bit faster. But its 150fps vs 100fps faster.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,719
|
Quote:
The 580 is 29% faster than the 470, whether that's worth $200 to you only you can say. You could get another 470 for $209 AMIR, which would probably be your biggest "bang for buck" upgrade on a 470.
__________________
Rig1: intel 990X + 2 X EVGA 3GB GTX580 + 3 X Acer GD235Hz 3D Vision Surround Rig 2: intel 2500K + NVIDIA GTX590 + Dell 3007 WFPHC [SIZE="1"]NVIDIA Focus Group Member [B]NVIDIA Focus Group Members receive free software and/or hardware from NVIDIA from time to time to facilitate the evaluation of NVIDIA products. However, the opinions expressed are solely those of the Members.[/B][/SIZE] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
![]() The 470 is a fine card, but this is why I hung on to my 480. Yes, the 580 is more powerful, but not near enough to warrant the lost $$ on selling the 480. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 379
|
Same here and little did I know that I could run it 24/7 at 850 core and 2103 mem. That makes it as fast or damn close to a stock 580. It is a loud mother though. I want to get one of those zalman vf series coolers for it because they really curbstomp the stock cooler but I am also thinking sli by getting another 480 and that cooler may not give me clearance to run sli. Geesh.. 2x 480's would be very loud and hot I bet. Now I could run that cooler on the lower card but again I would still have one loud 480..
__________________
MSI P67GD55 Intel i7 2600k @ 4.8ghz 1.35v, 1.40v full load Cooler Master Hyper 212 Gigabyte 580 @945/2232 4 Gigs Ripjaw @ 1600 Antec (a good one) 650w A Partridge in a pear tree. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Fans at 85% are still silent and temps never go above 55c. So worth it. |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 379
|
Quote:
Need to update sig. That 4.8 didnt turn out to be stable. The new i7 chips are really weird. It can be stable in a game at 4.8 all day long but bsod in IE or firefox ?!?!?! Others report the same. Prime stable 12hrs only to have it BSOD in word and have to back off one multi step or up the volts !! hahah
__________________
MSI P67GD55 Intel i7 2600k @ 4.8ghz 1.35v, 1.40v full load Cooler Master Hyper 212 Gigabyte 580 @945/2232 4 Gigs Ripjaw @ 1600 Antec (a good one) 650w A Partridge in a pear tree. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
![]() I have no advice for ya I'm hoping to upgrade after all the smoke clears when bulldozer hits the shelves, but I hope I don't run into a problem like that. That makes no sense at all...On the other hand it is good to hear that the 2600K is more than a match for the 480. ![]() Best of luck with that bsod issue too ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 379
|
Quote:
__________________
MSI P67GD55 Intel i7 2600k @ 4.8ghz 1.35v, 1.40v full load Cooler Master Hyper 212 Gigabyte 580 @945/2232 4 Gigs Ripjaw @ 1600 Antec (a good one) 650w A Partridge in a pear tree. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Crazed Crack Head
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 275
|
OC your 580. many will do 950/2200 24/7 stable.
that's where you see real benefits over the 470/480. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|