Official 3DMark 11 Thread

[sammy sung]

Originally Posted by Moshing

Indeed it can. 4Ghz isn't really pushing anything very hard on the CPUs is it? Anything less then 4.6Ghz on that machine will kinda be disappointing, eh? You can make up the score difference, I'm sure of it. Just PUSH those procs already, you're not even making them sweat!

Idd, Tri sli 580's needs a LOT of cpu to give their best :

http://hardocp.com/article/2011/05/0..._trifire_redux

[AdamK47]

Updated Results:


http://3dmark.com/3dm11/1222238


Intel Core i7 980X @ 4200MHz
Asus P6X58D Premium @ 21 x 200MHz
12GB Corsair XMS3 @ 2000 DDR
Three GTX 580 in 3-way SLI @ 850/2200
120GB OCZ Vertex 3 SSD
50GB OCZ Vertex 2 SSD
Two 3TB Hitachi 7K3000 in RAID-0 - 6TB
1TB SpinPoint F1
LG 32" 32LD450 LCD
Samsung 22X SH-S223L DVD-RW
Asus Xonar Essence STX sound card
Antec Twelve Hundred case
Corsair H70 cooler
Corsair AX1200 power supply

[shadow001]

New high score, and the exact same settings and clock speeds on the CPU to boot....


16800


http://3dmark.com/3dm11/1223730;jses...2vMuqz0U70DeTU

[AdamK47]

Originally Posted by shadow001

New high score, and the exact same settings and clock speeds on the CPU to boot....


16800


http://3dmark.com/3dm11/1223730;jses...2vMuqz0U70DeTU

I would have expected your system to trounce mine. My system is only 514 points away. I could probably tweak my system a little further and get more clock speed out of the GPU, memory, and CPU then be over it

I only post results from a 100% stable 24/7 clock setting, so I'd have to make sure it was fully stable before posting results.

[Roadhog]

Originally Posted by AdamK47

I would have expected your system to trounce mine. My system is only 514 points away. I could probably tweak my system a little further and get more clock speed out of the GPU, memory, and CPU then be over it

I only post results from a 100% stable 24/7 clock setting, so I'd have to make sure it was fully stable before posting results.

You have higher FPS than he does in the graphics test, with much lower clocked gpus. lol

[sammy sung]

Originally Posted by slaWter

Clock speed, not Cores though. That's why I can't wait for SNB-E to have more overclocking headroom for the 6 Cores
Looking forward to my next Tri-SLI test run.

Yea i know but that was sorta given considering the link, it's pretty obvious it's clockspeed instead of additional cores that matter in the article so i don't think anyone would confuse the 2

[sammy sung]

Originally Posted by slaWter

I wasn't trying to correct you Sorry about that.
Just pointing out the obvious I guess

I know, no worries bud

[[AK]Zip]

I reran the test with a new driver and got a very nice increase.

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/1236732

3DMark Score: P11485
Graphics Score: 12519
Physics Score: 9556
Combined Score: 8728
GraphicsTest1: 53 FPS
GraphicsTest2: 57 FPS
GraphicsTest3: 81 FPS
GraphicsTest4: 39 FPS
PhysicsTest: 30 FPS
CombinedTest: 40 FPS

GTX480 in SLI. 870/1740/2225

[JaxMacFL]

5.15GHz (50 x 103) Tri-fire @ 900/1225


By jaxmacfl at 2011-05-21

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/1241061

[Llamalama]

Based on my spec does this look right? It seems a bit low to me. This is using 270.61.

3DMark11:P9328 3DMarks

[[AK]Zip]

GPU stock clocks? If so then it's about right.

[Llamalama]

Ok thanks. Both GPU at stock. I wouldn't dare OC them as they are already loud & hot on load. I'm thinking of ditching them for one 580 but that feels like taking a step back.