Go Back   nV News Forums > Hardware Forums > Benchmarking And Overclocking

Newegg Daily Deals

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-22-11, 06:58 PM   #133
AdamK47
 
AdamK47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Cinci, OH
Posts: 984
Default Re: Official 3DMark 11 Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by JaxMacFL View Post
5.15GHz (50 x 103) Tri-fire @ 900/1225


By jaxmacfl at 2011-05-21

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/1241061
Pretty good for socket 1155. I would have expected more with triple crossfire. I'm waiting for socket 2011 for a true upgrade.
AdamK47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-11, 08:07 AM   #134
JaxMacFL
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 474
Default Re: Official 3DMark 11 Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamK47 View Post
....I'm waiting for socket 2011 for a true upgrade.
Yeah, I'm figuring on getting a socket 2011 and a compatible pair of 28nm high end graphic cards to go with it when the time comes. Be it ati or nvidia. Whichever performs the most efficient.
__________________
i7 2600K @ 4.8GHz (1.40v) w/NH-D14 - P8P67 WS B3 rev (BIOS 2105) - G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3-1600 16GB (7-8-7-24-2T) - Sapphire 7970 Crossfire w/Xtreme 7970 coolers - OCZ Agility 3 240GB - Dell 3008FPW - SB X-Fi Tit Fatal1ty Pro - Seasonic X-1250W - CM HAF X RC942 - Win 7 HP x64 SP1
JaxMacFL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-11, 09:26 PM   #135
GeniusPr0
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 173
Default Re: Official 3DMark 11 Thread

currently the fastest score for any notebook in the world:

Alienware M18x 6970m Xfire

P7851

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/1270079
__________________
3930K 4.4Ghz Liquid Cooled | 16GB 1866Mhz | PM830 256GB | 680 SLI 100+/500+
GeniusPr0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-11, 09:28 PM   #136
Roadhog
Resident Alien
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,776
Default Re: Official 3DMark 11 Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by GeniusPr0 View Post
currently the fastest score for any notebook in the world:

Alienware M18x 6970m Xfire

P7851

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/1270079
Not like ati scores matter. It's so easy to disable tessellation.
Roadhog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-11, 09:29 PM   #137
GeniusPr0
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 173
Default Re: Official 3DMark 11 Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadhog View Post
Not like ati scores matter. It's so easy to disable tessellation.
ati wins w/ it on or off. so its not like nvidia's gtx 485m sli scores matter? lol. trolling isnt healthy bro.

before my gtx 480 only did 6k~.

heres AMD optimized: http://3dmark.com/3dm11/1276520
GeniusPr0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-11, 12:26 PM   #138
Roadhog
Resident Alien
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,776
Default Re: Official 3DMark 11 Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by GeniusPr0 View Post
ati wins w/ it on or off. so its not like nvidia's gtx 485m sli scores matter? lol. trolling isnt healthy bro.

before my gtx 480 only did 6k~.

heres AMD optimized: http://3dmark.com/3dm11/1276520
AMD optimized doesn't affect tessellation in 3dmark11. Though it is clear that you did turn it off on your other score since it is a lot higher. I don't get why people feel the need to cheat in a benchmark.
Roadhog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-11, 12:29 PM   #139
Moshing
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 161
Default Re: Official 3DMark 11 Thread

Meh, seems right for 2 cards to me.
__________________
Ci7 2600K @5Ghz/8Gb Patriot Viper II/Asus Sabertooth P67/EVGA GTX580 Black Ops/2x Patriot Torqx 128G(OS)/1Tb WD Black
Ci7 920/6Gb Corsair DDR3 1600/GA-EX58-UD3R/Radeon HD5870/750Gb Seagate ES.2(OS)/2x 2Tb WD Green
Ci7 860/4Gb Patriot Viper II/EVGA P55 SLI/Radeon HD5870/750Gb Seagate ES.2 (wife's rig)
Moshing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-11, 02:11 PM   #140
Moshing
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 161
Default Re: Official 3DMark 11 Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadhog View Post
AMD optimized doesn't affect tessellation in 3dmark11. Though it is clear that you did turn it off on your other score since it is a lot higher. I don't get why people feel the need to cheat in a benchmark.
It's a PAIR of 6970M's, not one. That score looks perfect for Crossfire mobile chips. I'm having difficulty seeing the problem here. If it was just one GPU, I'd see the problem since a single 6970 should not beat a GTX 580 unless the 6970 is overclocked to high hell and back while the GTX 580 is pure stock speed. But with 2 mobile 6970s in Crossfire, that looks like a proper score to me.
__________________
Ci7 2600K @5Ghz/8Gb Patriot Viper II/Asus Sabertooth P67/EVGA GTX580 Black Ops/2x Patriot Torqx 128G(OS)/1Tb WD Black
Ci7 920/6Gb Corsair DDR3 1600/GA-EX58-UD3R/Radeon HD5870/750Gb Seagate ES.2(OS)/2x 2Tb WD Green
Ci7 860/4Gb Patriot Viper II/EVGA P55 SLI/Radeon HD5870/750Gb Seagate ES.2 (wife's rig)
Moshing is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 05-28-11, 05:53 PM   #141
Roadhog
Resident Alien
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,776
Default Re: Official 3DMark 11 Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moshing View Post
It's a PAIR of 6970M's, not one. That score looks perfect for Crossfire mobile chips. I'm having difficulty seeing the problem here. If it was just one GPU, I'd see the problem since a single 6970 should not beat a GTX 580 unless the 6970 is overclocked to high hell and back while the GTX 580 is pure stock speed. But with 2 mobile 6970s in Crossfire, that looks like a proper score to me.
The first score he posted is without tessellation, the second score is with tessellation, hence why it's a lot lower. He even said it himself.
Roadhog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-11, 06:55 PM   #142
Sean_W
Registered User
 
Sean_W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,423
Default Re: Official 3DMark 11 Thread

The least they could do is let you have your native resolution in the free version FFS.

Pretty ****ing useless benchmark at 1280 is pretty CPU limited.
Sean_W is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-11, 08:52 AM   #143
snowmanwithahat
Snowy
 
snowmanwithahat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 974
Default Re: Official 3DMark 11 Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by -=DVS=- View Post
Uhh this new benchmark is a complete fail , check out Final score and difference in actual game FPS 2xSLI vs 3xSLI , major difference in FPS but final score is barely higher.



Results taken from xtremesystems.
But the graphics score went up...

You have to realize that the final score is a composite of graphics and cpu. If there's hardly any gain in SYSTEM performance with better graphics cards it won't go up much
__________________
---Gaming Rig---
Q6600 3.4ghz (378x9) - 1.5v
Gigabyte EP45-UD3P
8gb (4x2gb) OCZ Gold DDR2-800 (5-4-4-12)
MSI+ASUS GTX 470 SLI
Dell u3011 IPS Display
HP 22" Auxiliary Monitor
256gb Western Digital Silicon Edge Blue SSD
5x2tb RAID-5 Array
750W PC P&C PSU
Windows 7 Pro 64-Bit & Ubuntu 10.04 64-bit

---Gaming Laptop---
ASUS G53JW
Core i7 740QM
16gb DDR3
Nvidia GTX 460m
1tb WD HDD
120gb Corsair SSD

Join the NvNews Folding @ Home Team
snowmanwithahat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-11, 03:40 AM   #144
Muppet
Registered User
 
Muppet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 3,130
Default Re: Official 3DMark 11 Thread

Haven't run this for a while and wanted to do some benching.

__________________
Asus Rampage IV Extreme Black Edition | Intel 4930k | SS Phasechange | 16GB Corsair Platinum DDR3 1866 | Asus GTX680 x2 SLI | Corsair AX1200 Watt PSU | Lian-Li PC-8NWX | Intel 520 120Gb SSD x2 | Samsung S27A950D 27" 120Hz | HP ZR24w 24" S-IPS x3 Nvidia Surround @6000x1200 | Xonar Essence STX
Muppet is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2014, nV News.