glxgears scores w/ 46.20 driver

[dpw2atox]

Well im using an nforce 2 board with a Geforce FX5600 w/ 256MB ram and the 46.20 drivers.
here are my scores:
(im keeping glxgears at default size)

10357 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2071.400 FPS

Im just curious what everyone's scores are because my friend has a geforce 4 ti4200 and he gets just over 5000FPS in glxgears and im curious what others get and why mine is as low as it is.

[Zenislev]

I have a Geforce 4 ti4800se and I used to get around 4600 with the 4496 driver. Now with the 4620 I get around 4150 on average. The games I use are much better performance wise though.

Soltek 75FRN2-RL (Nforce2 400 Ultra)
Athlon XP 2500+ (Barton Core)
OCZ-3500LL Mem
Maxtor 120GB 2MB Cache
Leadtek Winfast A280TD MyVivo Edition (ti 4800se)
LG 32x12x40 CD-RW and 16x DVD Combo

[beaner]

I have a Dual Opteron system running Mandrake 64bits on it.

And My card is a Quadro FX 2000

and I have 2 Gigs of RAM

And the sucky driver can't get GlxGears over 50fps

Crap!

[elanthis]

Nothing wrong with the "sucky" driver, there's something wrong with your system. You either didn't install the driver right, a software upgrade broke the driver, or Mandrake has some weird incompatbility with the driver (similar to the FC1 /usr/X11R6/lib/tls issue).

If you're going to rant about suckiness, rant at the people responsible. ;-) Or, post a detailed thread with all the information you can think about the problem, and someone will help you fix it.

[LordMorgul]

A dual opteron system should do far better than 50fps in software alone.

P4 2.0a i850e at 4x AGP, GeF4 ti4400.
I run ~3600fps on 46.20 and just before upgrading was running 44.96 at ~3800fps, but previously have seen this system run ~4300+ using 44.96 and 43.63 using the 2.6.0-test5 kernel with some patches. Right now I'm on 2.6.0-test9 patches and there seems to be some performance loss, but haven't tested with a well controlled set of parameters (and glxgears is a poor benchmark anyway).