|
|
#1 | |
|
Registered User
|
There's this technology in the world that is called wireless display. I'm having problem finding something like this. DLink has it and I saw it on engadget not long ago.
What exactly do you call this kind of technology, is it actually in the marketing now? If it is, I need to know the exact name so I can find it easily. I'm interested in owning one. It cost $150~ if from DLink. It's nice to have something that you could connect your laptop without having headaches using the wires at any times. Here's one, found thru google by "WiDi". http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-...splay-adapter/ If I use BestBuy, it won't find such device.
__________________
[MY PC] -- 3DMarkVantage: H7522 -- Q9450 @ 3.2GHZ 1.15V | THERMALRIGHT TRUE BLACK ULTRA-120 | DFI LANPARTY DK P45-T2RS | 4GB G.SKILL DDR2-1000 -- EVGA 280GTX | SAMSUNG 225BW | X-FI XTREMEGAMER FPS | Z-5300e | Z-2300 | 250GB SEAGATE | RAZER LACHESIS -- 320GB WESTERNDIGITAL | TAGAN 700W | G15 rev. 2 | NINE HUNDRED | VISTA HOME PREMIUM -- no longer own this system [MY LAPTOP] -- MAC BOOK PRO 13" | DUAL BOOT WITH WINDOWS 7 ULTIMATE 64-BIT | 2.3GHz i5 | 4GB DDR3 | -- OSX LION | 320GB HDD -- Girlfriend's laptop is same as mine and it recently fried, lawl [STUFF] -- PSN: lqfocus06 -- AEKDB |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 446
|
there is no great wireless display solution yet.
All recent interfaces use too much bandwidth for wireless: HDMI can carry 5Gb+, Display port more than the double... So, it's either very short distance (line of sight/15ft), bulky adapters (with 3+ antennas), reduced display quality (as they need to compress the video stream on the fly) or all of the above. So far, nothing beats a simple cable...
__________________
As the universe is curved, there cannot be a straight answer... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,726
|
What Frenchy said. Plugging a cable into the side of your laptop is far easier than trying to get a wireless solution to work, and will have a better picture than wireless.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|