|
|
#25 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Utah
Posts: 2,263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 132
|
You would think he would be a little more appreciative. I guess not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Utah
Posts: 2,263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 132
|
Quote:
Now, there are two possibilities: 1) You did not know if there was a GK110 (or whatever you want to call it). 2) You did know there was a GK110, and you were being dishonest on purpose. I took your statement at face value and assumed possibility 1. I then provided you with the knowledge that there is indeed a GK110. Generally, when I receive knowledge I did not previously have, I am happy about it. However, my sharing my knowledge with you resulted in what I would consider a negative response. I do not understand the reasoning of a negative response to my statements. I was expecting you to express a similar emotion as I would have upon gaining insight I did not have before, but that was not the case. I do not know why there being a GK110 makes you unhappy, nor can I do anything about your emotional state regarding these matters. If you desire to persist in a delusion, that is your choice. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Utah
Posts: 2,263
|
Quote:
So, to re-iterate, GK110, if its even called that, because theres no actual hard evidence it exists, might not exist from a GPU product standpoint because if it does exist it probably is a compute-specific product and not a desktop GPU. This is just a personal guess/opinion from the facts that exist as I have seen thus far. My guess/opinion can't be wrong because it is a guess/opinion and the hard evidence doesn't exist yet to disprove/prove my guess/opinion. Maybe in the future this will change. As far as we, GPU enthusiasts, are concerned, GK110 might as well not exist, and theres no magic "bigger better kepler" waiting in the wings. That was what I was implying. I could be wrong, but we'll see. ...Is that clear enough for you this time? |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|