Go Back   nV News Forums > Hardware Forums > General Hardware

Newegg Daily Deals

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-23-04, 02:51 AM   #1
Teebinator
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 10
Default Monitor Question??

I own a Geforce 5900 Ultra and now am looking at buying a new monitor. My question is what type of monitor am I better going with for maximum performance and graphics to match my 5900 U, a LCD or a CRT??
I know that LCD's dont have high resolution like a CRT does, but the LCD is is suppose to be clearer and better to look at. Any information on what direction I should go on buying a new monitor would be appreciated.

Thanks
Tibbs
Teebinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-04, 07:04 AM   #2
saturnotaku
Apple user. Deal with it.
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: The 'burbs, IL USA
Posts: 12,502
Default

Using the DVI port on your video card to hook it up to an LCD does, IMO give you a better overall picture quality than any CRT. You also can't beat the size, weight and low power consumption of an LCD.

That said, there are flat panel displays which can hit crazy high resolutions. If you have the funds available, the LCD that's getting all the raves right now is the Dell 2100FP. It has a native resolution of 1600x1200 with a 16 ms response time. That latter number will go a long way in improving your gaming experience. If you decide to go the LCD route, do not buy one with a response time greater than 16 if you're going to be gaming heavily.
saturnotaku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-04, 10:32 AM   #3
PenguinJim
 
PenguinJim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: I live in my chair in the UK
Posts: 440
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by saturnotaku
If you decide to go the LCD route, do not buy one with a response time greater than 16 if you're going to be gaming heavily.
The exception to this rule being the Hercules Prophetview 920 DVI. Despite a stated response time of 20ms, this monitor can match and apparently sometimes beat 16ms monitors.

There's an LCD thread here: http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/show...threadid=23808
and here: http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/show...threadid=22823
for more information on LCD screens.
PenguinJim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-04, 02:45 PM   #4
GlowStick
CoD4!
 
GlowStick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 5,786
Send a message via AIM to GlowStick
Default

This anandtech article really explanes well about the 16ms AUOptronics panels out there

http://www.anandtech.com/showdoc.html?i=1918&p=5

Quote:
Several months ago, we looked at Hitachi's 16ms response time LCD. This monitor was based off the first commercial 16ms panel, AUO's M170EN05. While this panel is good, it has a few adherent flaws to it. The first flaw is, of course, the 262,000 color limitation. Even though 16M colors can be achieved by dithering the pixels (emulated 24-bit), the evidence was clear when comparing our Samsung 172T and the Hitachi CML174 that Samsung had a dominate edge on color reproduction.
__________________
Intel i7-2600K, Corsair 8Gig, Corsair H100, Corsair 650D, Corsair HX750, ATi 6970, WD Caviar Black 2TB
Sony Vaio SB: i7, 8Gig, Intel 320 300gig
GlowStick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-04, 09:09 PM   #5
Teebinator
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 10
Default

Thanks
Teebinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2014, nV News.