Go Back   nV News Forums > Hardware Forums > Benchmarking And Overclocking

Newegg Daily Deals

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-17-04, 04:33 PM   #1
SH64
MAXIMUM TECH
 
SH64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Indiana
Posts: 12,202
Thumbs up Benchmarking Unreal Tournament 2004 article

First of all .. thanks to Mike for the informative article
http://www.nvnews.net/articles/bench...04/index.shtml
finally i have a good refrence to benchmark UT2004 & i know how to configure it on my own!

I've done the ONS_Dria benchamrk & got those results :

Quote:
UT2004 Build UT2004_Patch_[2004-06-11_16.51]
Windows XP 5.1 (Build: 2600)
GenuineIntel Unknown processor @ 3217 MHz with 1023MB RAM
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950 Ultra (5672)

-exitafterdemo -benchmark -ini=UT2004.ini -exec=..\benchmark\stuff\demo_ONS_dria.txt -nosound -d3d -1024x768

35.820119 fps rand[937]

-exitafterdemo -benchmark -ini=UT2004.ini -exec=..\benchmark\stuff\demo_ONS_dria.txt -nosound -d3d -1280x1024

30.463902 fps rand[6242]
The bench at both res was @ Highest settings + 4xAA,8xAF .

Looking at the numbers : i got 35.8fps @1024 , while the 6800's score is 37.5fps only ?? do you think theres something wrong considring Mike's PC has a better CPU & GPU
__________________


- "My name is RAM and my tank is full"

http://warhawk64nv.mybrute.com/ <-- pupils go thaarrr! Or,
http://silenthunter64.mybrute.com
SH64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-04, 04:47 PM   #2
MikeC
Administrator
 
MikeC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1997
Location: Virginia
Posts: 5,357
Default Re: Benchmarking Unreal Tournament 2004 Article

Glad the article was helpful. The results I posted were from a GeForce 6800 (non-Ultra), which has 128MB of RAM. Only having 128MB of RAM limits the performance of the GeForce 6800 when 4X AA / 8X AF is used with the highest quality setting in UT2004.

Compared to the 37.5 fps at 1024x768 on the GeForce 6800, I was getting 55 fps with the 6800 Ultra.
MikeC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-04, 04:57 PM   #3
SH64
MAXIMUM TECH
 
SH64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Indiana
Posts: 12,202
Default Re: Benchmarking Unreal Tournament 2004 Article

Hmmm i see .. thanks !

thats a big differnece indeed between the 6800 & 6800Ultra & 128/256MB cards !!

i'll keep this bench as refernce for my future "intense UT2004" benchmarks instead of doing 5 different benchs & thus more misleading numbers that i dont need
__________________


- "My name is RAM and my tank is full"

http://warhawk64nv.mybrute.com/ <-- pupils go thaarrr! Or,
http://silenthunter64.mybrute.com
SH64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-04, 05:38 AM   #4
Quasar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 13
Default Re: Benchmarking Unreal Tournament 2004 Article

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeC
Glad the article was helpful. The results I posted were from a [...] I was getting 55 fps with the 6800 Ultra.
And even that score ist mostly limited by insufficient VRAM-Size.


With my demo, i can get FC to crawl at 9,06fps in 16x12x3 with 4xAA and maximum AF enabled. The 6800-cards with 256MB are more than twice as fast there... but do not have double the bandwidth or fillrate.
__________________
Just an ordinary guy
Quasar is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Official : Unreal Tournament 2003 | Comments | Reviews | Tips | Help volt Gaming Central 121 03-23-10 08:07 PM
Can't set Unreal Tournament 2003 to 16-bit colors? ant NVIDIA Linux 6 09-17-02 11:40 AM
The Inquirer Blasted druga runda Feedback Forum 49 09-14-02 05:17 AM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2014, nV News.