Go Back   nV News Forums > Hardware Forums > Benchmarking And Overclocking

Newegg Daily Deals

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-15-04, 05:38 PM   #37
Nick[FM]
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 38
Default Re: 3DMark 2005 Screenshots

Quote:
Originally Posted by qballshalls2002
Hey Nick,

Will 3dmark2005 be gpu limited just like 3dmark2003 was?
As far as I know (I haven't yet looked at any results with same GPU/VPU and different MHz CPU's) it should be less GPU/VPU limited than 3DMark03 is, but I am not sure how much.
__________________
.: Nick Renqvist
.: Site Manager - Futuremark & YouGamers & ORB
.: My Homepage & Blog - http://www.yougamers.com/me/nickfm/
.: 3DMark06 HW Stats: http://www.yougamers.com/hardware/st...ark06/alltime/
Nick[FM] is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-04, 12:54 AM   #38
motleycrue
Brute
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 18
Send a message via ICQ to motleycrue Send a message via MSN to motleycrue
Default Re: 3DMark 2005 Screenshots

lol..

speaking of good old days..... whens kiss coming to town?
motleycrue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-04, 06:55 PM   #39
DavoNogo
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 5
Default Re: 3DMark 2005 Screenshots

Here's a little snippet from an article in an Aussie Mag:

To appreciate 3DMark05, one has to look at FutureMark's fourth and current release, 3DMark03. Up until 03, the engine used to create 3DMark has been the MAX-FX engine from Remedy Entertainment originally created for Max Payne. With DirectX 9.0 though, Mutlitexturing went out of favour and shaders became the central element. The aging MAX-FX engine wasn't designed with this in mind and the decision was made to start over with a new engine bred for DirectX 9.0 shaders. The end result was 3DMark03, a well received benchmark that didn't however blow away the audience in the same way as its predecessor. The major issue was that it didn't exlpoit the possibilities afforded by DirectX 9.0; out of the four tests, only Mother Nature used DirectX 9.0 features. At the time, DX9.0 hardware sales had not reached critical mass. Now DX9.0 has trickled its way down to mainstream, the developers of 3DMark are finally making the benchmark that will have today's DirectX9.0 cards struggling under the strain and begging for release. Just the way we like it!

Bear in mind: if your card doesn't support pixel shaders 2.0 or higher, don't bother with 3DMark05. You find any half-assed DirectX8.0 tests here; every test will use DirectX9.0 features in one form or another. In fact they are designed for the second generation of DX9.0 GPUs, those that support up to PS3.0

The most radical change in 3DMark05 is the way shaders are actually created - a shader describes the relationship between the type of material and a type of light. The problem is everyone wants to see lots of shader effects and there is no shortage of material/light combinations. Skin lit with a point light is different if lit with a directional light. Ambient lit metal has different shader code to ambient lit marble. 'In an actual game with enormous amount of graphics content, different objects with different materials and different shaders for all those, the total amount of shaders get completely out of hand and become very hard to manage' says Patric Ojala, the senior manager of benchmark development at Futuremark.

The solution they came up with was to automate this process and build shaders as they are needed. Although there are many material/light combinations, a particular material will behave similarly (though not the same) for different types of lights. With a dynamic shader engine, you can write the shader once and let the engine generate the different versions of the shader for different lights. Based on what artists specify, the engine can even create shaders on the fly. Patric explains: "Our solution is to procedually make only the shaders that are needed for rendering the next frame, If a new material appears in the next frame, we make a shader for it, but no sooner than that. This way the code and content is easier to manage, and the rendering engine is more flexible."

While 3DMark03 used mostly DirectX8.0 level shaders, 3DMark05 has really cranked up what DX9.0 can do. Materials are significantly more complex, and where appropriate, previous hacks have been replaced with more robust solutions. Many of the materials do Blinn-Phong shading or some modification to it.
DavoNogo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-04, 11:51 PM   #40
motleycrue
Brute
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 18
Send a message via ICQ to motleycrue Send a message via MSN to motleycrue
Default Re: 3DMark 2005 Screenshots

EDITED BY MUYA: Be Nice Please.

Last edited by MUYA; 09-18-04 at 11:02 AM.
motleycrue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-04, 08:59 AM   #41
Nick[FM]
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 38
Default Re: 3DMark 2005 Screenshots

Not sure what you are talking about, but you may have your personal reasons for quoting me on something I've never said.
__________________
.: Nick Renqvist
.: Site Manager - Futuremark & YouGamers & ORB
.: My Homepage & Blog - http://www.yougamers.com/me/nickfm/
.: 3DMark06 HW Stats: http://www.yougamers.com/hardware/st...ark06/alltime/

Last edited by MUYA; 09-18-04 at 11:02 AM.
Nick[FM] is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-04, 12:15 PM   #42
jAkUp
eat. sleep. overclock.
 
jAkUp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chino, California
Posts: 17,744
Default Re: 3DMark 2005 Screenshots

__________________
965xe || evga x58 classified || 3x evga gtx 480 || 6gb g.skill || win7 x64
jAkUp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-04, 01:24 PM   #43
Clay
Registered User
 
Clay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,993
Default Re: 3DMark 2005 Screenshots

Nice! Where'd you get this pic?

EDIT: NM
http://www.futuremark.com/news/?news...409/2004092105

Last edited by Clay; 09-21-04 at 01:46 PM.
Clay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-04, 07:25 PM   #44
Kev1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 679
Default Re: 3DMark 2005 Screenshots

I saw the system requirements and I apparently meet them, but will it be slide show on my setup? Should I even bother downloading?

Currently get 6133 3D Marks in 3D Mark 03
Kev1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Assassin's Creed 3 multiplayer screenshots and information News Archived News Items 0 06-07-12 09:50 AM
Company of Heroes 2 screenshots show a snowy town, tank columns and pyromania News Archived News Items 0 06-05-12 08:00 PM
Computex: 3DMark Announces Windows 8 Benchmarking - First Screenshots News Archived News Items 0 06-05-12 06:30 PM
Max Payne 3 system requirements updated, new PC screenshots released News Archived News Items 0 05-28-12 06:49 AM
NOLF 2 Screenshots and Impressions nin_fragile14 Gaming Central 3 10-04-02 03:39 PM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2014, nV News.