Go Back   nV News Forums > Software Forums > Gaming Central

Newegg Daily Deals

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-13-04, 07:33 AM   #49
Ninjaman09
Takin 'er easy
 
Ninjaman09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Jowjah
Posts: 6,687
Default Re: 6800 Ultra win in Xbit's CS: Source benchmarks

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doom_Machine
its funny seeing ati and nv loyalists argue pointless bench results over a few frames......both cards will give the user a good experience and since human eyes can only see a maximum of 60 fps at 75-80 mhz and even an occasional drop to 30fps isnt noticable if your into the game,so who cares
That's exactly what I've been saying!! Did you read ANY of my posts? I FEEL LIKE I'M TAKING CRAZY PILLS!!!
__________________
Core i7 920 @ 3.2 | ASUS P6T Deluxe V2
6GB Mushkin DDR3-1600 RAM
eVGA GTX 570 SC | Auzen X-Fi Prelude 7.1
CORSAIR CMPSU-850TX
Dell U2410
Ninjaman09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-04, 09:40 AM   #50
Doom_Machine
Registered User
 
Doom_Machine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 29
Default Re: 6800 Ultra win in Xbit's CS: Source benchmarks

if you could read you would notice i said maximum perception is at 60fps at 75-80mhz..thats the best and prefered quality you could possibly percieve..i never said anything bout not noticing any less as of course you can but most arnt as likely to notice a short 30fps drops if your into the game, you obviously would be suprised to know of the countless different things most dont notice without side by side comarison....if you think its more responsive at any higher fps then its pschosematic..meaning in your head, look it up in the med journals....unless your eyes are an alien hybrid clone

Quote:
Originally Posted by jolle
Sooo.. you wouldnt mind putting your mouse on PS/2 port and underclock it to 30hz then?
I mean your not gonna se the difference anyway right? with your human eyes..
hehe, IMO it feels more responsive the higher FPS you got, and CS:S is a comepetative game..
Im not that picky about it in SP games.



Scores are lower due to CPU bottlenecking I guess, which explains why AA doesnt lower the FPS alot either..
The benches arent made on the map the beta was running, it only had 1 map, and the maps are diff in CPU load depending on ex amount of loose objects handled by physics..
FS benchmarks timedemos with lots of action in them, Xbits benches uses timedemos with no action in them, no players, so that prolly puts less strain on CPU..
__________________
P4c-3.4ghz
6800 gt golden sample 425/1100
2 Raptors 10krpm raid 0-32k stripe
Hyper x 512mb ddr400
Antec 350 case (shown in avatar)
Doom_Machine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-04, 09:44 AM   #51
ragejg
nV News Alumni
 
ragejg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Finger Lakes of Hell, NY
Posts: 5,399
Send a message via AIM to ragejg
Default Re: 6800 Ultra win in Xbit's CS: Source benchmarks

Grr...

Chill, folks.

I have flibble-sticks and a wicked threadblade...

don't make me use them...
__________________

2010-2011 Reviews: GTX 570 | GTX 580 | GTS 450 | GTX 460 | GTX 465
Pre-2010 Reviews: 6600 GT | XMS 4400 DDR | SilenX Cooler | 6800 | 5900 XT | Personal Cinema | 5900 NU


______________________________________________
Phenom II x6 1090t @ 4.0 ghz | Asus M498TD-EVO Am3 SLI nForce 980a | 2x EVGA GTX 560 SLI | 2x4gb DDR3-1333 | Antec EarthWatts EA650 PSU | 60gb Mushkin Calisto Enhanced Sandforce SSD | 2x WD2500KS RAID 0 | Sunbeam Tuniq 3 case | 24" Asus 19x10 LED LCD | 26" Panasonic 720p TV | Sidewinder X5 mouse | Logitech MX5500 & Revolution mouse | Altec Lansing 5.1 THX-Certified audio | Win 7 Ultimate | desk | couch


ragejg is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2014, nV News.