UT2k3 very bad FPS ??? - Page 2

Krasser Mann · 12-10-02, 01:42 AM

I think you are right.

Verry sad. In today´s world you find more and more onboard graphics and no AGP Bus. This Sucks

.

Ok i bought me a Intel P4 1,7 on an Asus P4B yesterday.

Running UT2K3 On Windows is now OK, On Linux it is lame as ever.

I´think i have to live with that.

Thanks to all for the tips.

KM

Chalnoth · 12-10-02, 02:08 AM

Well, you might be able to test it by dropping the texture detail way down in UT2k3. That should keep all textures on-board, and with all textures on-board, you would think that there would be no problem with the interface.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Bad News For Intel May Not Be So Bad For Nvidia	News	Latest Tech And Game Headlines	0	09-09-12 12:00 AM
Terribly slow FPS in glxguears with 304.37 driver	joegiampaoli	NVIDIA Linux	5	08-24-12 06:01 AM
My UT2003 Tweak Guide	DXnfiniteFX	Gaming Central	48	10-30-02 11:59 PM
low fps why???	nipster	Benchmarking And Overclocking	4	08-07-02 02:35 PM
so let's try this again in the new forum - bad performance with correctly inst.driver	neutrino	NVIDIA Linux	11	08-01-02 04:19 PM

12-10-02, 01:42 AM	#13
Krasser Mann Registered User Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 9	I think you are right. Verry sad. In today´s world you find more and more onboard graphics and no AGP Bus. This Sucks . Ok i bought me a Intel P4 1,7 on an Asus P4B yesterday. Running UT2K3 On Windows is now OK, On Linux it is lame as ever. I´think i have to live with that. Thanks to all for the tips. KM

12-10-02, 02:08 AM	#14
Chalnoth Registered User Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 1,293	Well, you might be able to test it by dropping the texture detail way down in UT2k3. That should keep all textures on-board, and with all textures on-board, you would think that there would be no problem with the interface.