|
|
#1 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 68
|
Having some problems...
First, 4191 is slooowwww... Ick... Back to 2960... nice and fast and stable. But the patch I have to bring the kernel bits into kernel 2.5.53 doesn't work for 2960... So... Anyone know if there is either... A) A patch to being 2960 up to spec with the new module-init-tools, or B) A patch to make 4191 not so godawful slow. Anyone? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 43
|
I'm afraid you're stuck waiting like the rest of us (unless linuxbugs@ smiles on you and send you a test driver set) on the 1.0-4191 "slowness." Did you try the tips I mentioned in #nvidia?
1.0-2960 can probably be fudged enough to work with 2.5.53+, but I can't vouch for it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 68
|
I tried the solid background thing, helped a little, less visually appealing though
![]() I suppose that a small sacrifice, but I'd still like to be able to cure the problem, rather than just bend around the symptoms. And the 2960 stuff I don't doubt it, but I'm not a kernel hacker, I got the patch for 4191 from somebdy else, and they only had the 4191 stuffs, googling for a 2960 patch gives nothing useful. But on the plus side I've been running 4191 on 2.5.53 for about seven hours, played UT2K3 a bit, and shot some rounds of foobiliard, no oopses yet. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 68
|
Hmm...
Thats odd.. It's working quick now... Maybe it just needed a push, but it's working much cleaner now since I played a round of ut2k3, maybe it needed a little push. Still slower than 2960, but barely noticable. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|