|
|
#1 | |
|
Registered User
|
I find that 3dmarks03's test are sorta wierd. The second test looks like doom 3 in a way, But it ran at 1-15fps. On the other hand, the doom3 alpha for me ran @ around 20-30fps at 1024x768once i got all patches for it and did a bit of tweaking. So something is wrong here with game test 2. Game test 3 is pretty strange aswell, What is causeing the frames to drop dramaticly to 4 frames/sec in that test, ive seen game with better graphics run at 60 frames/sec. I think doom3 alpha and UT2003 and Unreal2 are the true benchmarks because they also represent real game engins that will be used in ALOT of future games.
i am running an MSI GF4 Ti4200, Athlon 1400 (T-bird), A7A266, 256mb DDR cas2.0. Im also wondering how much more performance i will gain if i get an Nforce2 (will i benefit since i have a geforce4). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
.:. Lafiel .:.
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Outerspace
Posts: 3,009
|
Yes 3DMark03 is a lazy benchmark... big disappointment
![]()
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Tom's Hardware tests OpenCL acceleration across photo editing apps | News | Latest Tech And Game Headlines | 0 | 06-11-12 06:10 PM |
| The Anatomy of a Bad Game | News | Latest Tech And Game Headlines | 0 | 05-31-12 09:40 AM |
| Is it bad to leave geforce overclocked all the time? | Creole | General Hardware | 2 | 09-23-02 11:13 PM |
| so let's try this again in the new forum - bad performance with correctly inst.driver | neutrino | NVIDIA Linux | 11 | 08-01-02 04:19 PM |